In adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury, does the use of norepinephrine for augmenting cerebral perfusion pressure improve neurological outcome? A systematic review. Issue 10 (October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lloyd-Donald, Patryck; Spencer, William; Cheng, Jacinta; Romero, Lorena; Jithoo, Ron; Udy, Andrew; Fitzgerald, Mark C.
• Is Part Of: Injury. Volume 51:Issue 10(2020)
• Page Start: 2129
• Page End: 2134
• Publication Date: 2020-10
• Subjects: Traumatic brain injury -- Cerebral perfusion -- Norepinephrine -- Vasopressor -- Neurological outcomes; Wounds and injuries -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Accidents -- Periodicals; Wounds and Injuries -- surgery -- Periodicals; Lésions et blessures -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; Electronic journals; 617.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.07.054
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-1383

Abstract

Highlights: Norepinephrine administration to target a desired cerebral perfusion pressure is a mainstay of management in severe traumatic brain injury. Norepinephrine use in these patients may reduce secondary injury, however its impact on overall neurological outcomes remains unknown. Our systematic review of over 4800 articles revealed only two studies reporting neurological outcomes in this patient group. Neither study provided evidence that this therapy was beneficial for neurological outcomes, morbidity or mortality in patients with sTBI. No evidence exists to suggest norepinephrine targeting of cerebral perfusion pressure in this group is beneficial, requiring ongoing research. Abstract: Background and objective: Despite multiple interventions, mortality due to severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) within mature Trauma Systems has remained unchanged over the last decade. During this time, the use of vasoactive infusions (commonly norepinephrine) to achieve a target blood pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) has been a mainstay of sTBI management. However, evidence suggests that norepinephrine, whilst raising blood pressure, may reduce cerebral oxygenation. This study aimed to review the available evidence that links norepinephrine augmented CPP to clinical outcomes for these patients. Methods: A systematic review examining the evidence for norepinephrine augmented CPP in TBI patients was undertaken. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed for a dedicated literature search of multiple scientific databases. Two dedicated reviewers screened articles, whilst a third dedicated reviewer resolved conflicts. Results: The systematic review yielded 4, 809 articles, of which 1, 197 duplicate articles were removed. After abstract/title screening, 45 articles underwent full text review, resulting in the identification of two articles that investigated the effect of norepinephrine administration on clinical outcomes in patients following TBI when compared to other vasopressors. Neither study found a difference in neurological outcome between the vasopressor groups. No articles measured the effect of norepinephrine compared to no vasopressor use on the clinical outcome of patients with sTBI. Conclusions: Despite being a mainstay of pharmacological management for hypotension in patients following sTBI, there is minimal clinical evidence supporting the use of norepinephrine in targeting a CPP for either improving neurological outcomes or reducing mortality. Outcomes-based clinical trials exploring the role of brain tissue perfusion and oxygenation monitoring are required to validate any benefit.