The citation advantage of promoted articles in a cross‐publisher distribution platform: A 12‐month randomized controlled trial. (23rd December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kudlow, Paul; Bissky Dziadyk, Devin; Rutledge, Alan; Shachak, Aviv; Eysenbach, Gunther
• Is Part Of: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Volume 71:Number 10(2020:Oct.)
• Page Start: 1257
• Page End: 1274
• Publication Date: 2019-12-23
• Subjects: Information science -- Periodicals; Information technology -- Periodicals; 020.5
• DOI: 10.1002/asi.24330
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2330-1635

Abstract

Abstract: There is currently a paucity of evidence‐based strategies that have been shown to increase citations of peer‐reviewed articles following their publication. We conducted a 12‐month randomized controlled trial to examine whether the promotion of article links in an online cross‐publisher distribution platform (TrendMD) affects citations. In all, 3, 200 articles published in 64 peer‐reviewed journals across eight subject areas were block randomized at the subject level to either the TrendMD group ( n = 1, 600) or the control group ( n = 1, 600) of the study. Our primary outcome compares the mean citations of articles randomized to TrendMD versus control after 12 months. Articles randomized to TrendMD showed a 50% increase in mean citations relative to control at 12 months. The difference in mean citations at 12 months for articles randomized to TrendMD versus control was 5.06, 95% confidence interval [2.87, 7.25], was statistically significant ( p < .001) and found in three of eight subject areas. At 6 months following publication, articles randomized to TrendMD showed a smaller, yet statistically significant ( p = .005), 21% increase in mean citations, relative to control. To our knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled trial to demonstrate how an intervention can be used to increase citations of peer‐reviewed articles after they have been published.