Sex‐related difference in the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing complex high‐risk percutaneous coronary intervention: Insight from the cVAD registry. Issue 3 (21st October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Alraies, M Chadi; Kaki, Amir; Kajy, Marvin; Blank, Nimrod; Hasan, Reema; Htun, Wah Wah; Glazier, James J.; Elder, Mahir; O'Neill, William W.; Grines, Cindy L.; Schreiber, Theodore
• Is Part Of: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions. Volume 96:Issue 3(2020)
• Page Start: 536
• Page End: 544
• Publication Date: 2019-10-21
• Subjects: complex high‐risk indicated patients -- gender outcomes -- mechanical circulatory support -- percutaneous coronary intervention; Heart -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals; Cardiac catheterization -- Periodicals; 616.1207572
• DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28509
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1522-1946

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To assess the in‐hospital and short‐term outcome differences between males and females who underwent high‐risk PCI with mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Background: Sex differences have been noted in several percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) series with females less likely to be referred for PCI due increased risk of adverse events. However, data on sex differences in utilization and outcomes of high‐risk PCI with MCS is scarce. Methods: Using the cVAD Registry, we identified 1, 053 high‐risk patients who underwent PCI with MCS using Impella 2.5 or Impella CP. Patients with cardiogenic shock were excluded. A total of 792 (75.21%) males and 261 (24.79%) females were included in the analysis with median follow‐up of 81.5 days. Results: Females were more likely to be African American, older (72.05 ± 11.66 vs. 68.87 ± 11.17, p < .001), have a higher prevalence of diabetes (59.30 vs. 49.04%, p = .005), renal insufficiency (35.41 vs. 27.39%, p = .018), and peripheral vascular disease (31.89 vs. 25.39%, p of .05). Women had a higher mean STS score (8.21 ± 8.21 vs. 5.04 ± 5.97, p < .001) and lower cardiac output on presentation (3.64 ± 1.30 vs. 4.63 ± 1.49, p < .001). Although women had more comorbidities, there was no difference in in‐hospital mortality, stroke, MI or need for recurrent revascularization compared to males. Females were more likely to have multivessel revascularization than males. Ejection fraction improved in both males and females at the time of discharge (26.59 to 31.40% and 30.75 to 36.05%, respectively, p < .0001). However, females had higher rate of bleeding requiring transfusion compared with males (9.58 vs. 5.30%, p = .019). Conclusion: Female patients undergoing high PCI were older and had more comorbidities but had similar outcomes compared to males.