The problem of mediocre generalists: population genetics and eco-evolutionary perspectives on host breadth evolution in pathogens. Issue 1933 (19th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Visher, Elisa; Boots, Mike
• Is Part Of: Proceedings. Volume 287:Issue 1933(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-08-19
• Subjects: trade-offs -- host–parasite interactions -- coevolution -- virus evolution -- niche breadth -- theory; Biology -- Periodicals; 570.5
• DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1230
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0962-8452

Abstract

Abstract : Many of our theories for the generation and maintenance of diversity in nature depend on the existence of specialist biotic interactions which, in host–pathogen systems, also shape cross-species disease emergence. As such, niche breadth evolution, especially in host–parasite systems, remains a central focus in ecology and evolution. The predominant explanation for the existence of specialization in the literature is that niche breadth is constrained by trade-offs, such that a generalist is less fit on any particular environment than a given specialist. This trade-off theory has been used to predict niche breadth (co)evolution in both population genetics and eco-evolutionary models, with the different modelling methods providing separate, complementary insights. However, trade-offs may be far from universal, so population genetics theory has also proposed alternate mechanisms for costly generalism, including mutation accumulation. However, these mechanisms have yet to be integrated into eco-evolutionary models in order to understand how the mechanism of costly generalism alters the biological and ecological circumstances predicted to maintain specialism. In this review, we outline how population genetics and eco-evolutionary models based on trade-offs have provided insights for parasite niche breadth evolution and argue that the population genetics-derived mutation accumulation theory needs to be better integrated into eco-evolutionary theory.