Towards a predictive framework for biocrust mediation of plant performance: A meta‐analysis. (18th September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Havrilla, Caroline A.; Chaudhary, V. Bala; Ferrenberg, Scott; Antoninka, Anita J.; Belnap, Jayne; Bowker, Matthew A.; Eldridge, David J.; Faist, Akasha M.; Huber‐Sannwald, Elisabeth; Leslie, Alexander D.; Rodriguez‐Caballero, Emilio; Zhang, Yuanming; Barger, Nichole N.
• Editors: de Vries, Franciska
• Is Part Of: Journal of ecology. Volume 107:Number 6(2019:Nov.)
• Page Start: 2789
• Page End: 2807
• Publication Date: 2019-09-18
• Subjects: biological soil crust -- biotic interactions -- biotic resistance; biotic soil community; germination -- facilitation -- meta‐analysis -- plant functional traits -- plant–soil (below‐ground) interactions; Plant ecology -- Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13269
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-0477

Abstract

Abstract: Understanding the importance of biotic interactions in driving the distribution and abundance of species is a central goal of plant ecology. Early vascular plants likely colonized land occupied by biocrusts — photoautotrophic, surface‐dwelling soil communities comprised of cyanobacteria, bryophytes, lichens and fungi — suggesting biotic interactions between biocrusts and plants have been at play for some 2, 000 million years. Today, biocrusts coexist with plants in dryland ecosystems worldwide, and have been shown to both facilitate or inhibit plant species performance depending on ecological context. Yet, the factors that drive the direction and magnitude of these effects remain largely unknown. We conducted a meta‐analysis of plant responses to biocrusts using a global dataset encompassing 1, 004 studies from six continents. Meta‐analysis revealed there is no simple positive or negative effect of biocrusts on plants. Rather, plant responses differ by biocrust composition and plant species traits and vary across plant ontogeny. Moss‐dominated biocrusts facilitated, while lichen‐dominated biocrusts inhibited overall plant performance. Plant responses also varied among plant functional groups: C4 grasses received greater benefits from biocrusts compared to C3 grasses, and plants without N‐fixing symbionts responded more positively to biocrusts than plants with N‐fixing symbionts. Biocrusts decreased germination but facilitated growth of non‐native plant species. Synthesis . Results suggest that interspecific variation in plant responses to biocrusts, contingent on biocrust type, plant traits, and ontogeny can have strong impacts on plant species performance. These findings have important implications for understanding biocrust contributions to plant productivity and community assembly processes in ecosystems worldwide. Abstract : Biocrusts coexist with plants in dryland ecosystems worldwide where they have been shown to have variable effects on plant performance. Yet, what factors determine the direction and magnitude of plant responses remain largely unknown. We conducted a global meta‐analysis of existing biocrust‐plant interactions literature. Meta‐analysis revealed plant responses differ according to biocrust composition and plant characteristics, and across plant ontogeny.