Inherent variations in the cellular events at the site of amputation orchestrate scar‐free wound healing in the tail and scarred wound healing in the limb of lizard Hemidactylus flaviviridis. Issue 5 (1st November 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ranadive, Isha; Patel, Sonam; Buch, Pranav; Uggini, Gowrikumari; Desai, Isha; Balakrishnan, Suresh
• Is Part Of: Wound repair and regeneration. Volume 26:Issue 5(2018)
• Page Start: 366
• Page End: 380
• Publication Date: 2018-11-01
• Subjects: Wound healing -- Periodicals; Regeneration (Biology) -- Periodicals; 617.14
• DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12659
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1067-1927

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Lizards are unique in having both—regeneration competent (tail) as well as non‐regenerating appendages (limbs) in adults. They therefore present an appropriate model for comparing processes underlying regenerative repair and nonregenerative healing after amputation. In the current study, we use northern house gecko Hemidactylus flaviviridis to compare major cellular and molecular events following amputation of the limb and of the tail. Although the early response to injury in both cases comprises apoptosis, proliferation, and angiogenesis, the temporal distribution of these processes in each remained obscure. In this regard, observations were made on the anatomy and gene expression levels of key regulators of these processes during the healing phase of the tail and limb separately. It was revealed that cell proliferation markers like fibroblast growth factors were upregulated early in the healing tail, coinciding with the growing epithelium. The amputated limb, in contrast, showed weak expression of proliferation markers, limited only to fibroblasts in the later stage of healing. Additionally, apoptotic activity in the tail was limited to the very early phase of healing, as opposed to that in the limb, wherein high expression of caspase‐3 was observed throughout the healing process. Early rise in VEGF‐α expression reflected an early onset of angiogenesis in the tail, while it was seen to occur at a later stage in case of the limb. Moreover, the expression pattern of transforming growth factor beta members points toward a pro‐fibrotic response being induced very early in the amputated limb. Collectively, these results explain why regenerating appendages are able to heal without scars and if we are to induce scar‐free healing in nonregenerating limbs, what interventions can be envisaged. This is crucial to the field of regenerative medicine since it is the initial stages of repair following amputation, which decide whether the appendage will be restored or only covered with a scab.