Variability of first morning urine specific gravity in 103 healthy dogs. (19th August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rudinsky, Adam; Cortright, Catherine; Purcell, Sally; Cordner, Amy; Lord, Linda; Wellman, Maxey; DiBartola, Stephen; Chew, Dennis
• Is Part Of: Journal of veterinary internal medicine. Volume 33:Number 5(2019)
• Page Start: 2133
• Page End: 2137
• Publication Date: 2019-08-19
• Subjects: concentration -- urinalysis -- variance; Veterinary medicine -- Periodicals; 636.0896
• DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15592
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0891-6640

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Urine specific gravity (USG) is an integral part of the urinalysis and a key component of many clinical decisions, and fluctuations in USG have the potential to impact case management. Objectives: To determine the intraindividual variability of first morning USG results in healthy dogs. Animals: One hundred three healthy client‐owned dogs. Methods: Dogs were deemed healthy based on clinical history and physical examination findings. Repeated USG measurements were performed over the course of 2 weeks. Three urine samples were collected each week for a total of 6 samples per dog. Sample collection was distributed evenly throughout the week. Urine samples were acquired immediately upon waking and before any ingestion of liquids, food, or exertion of physical activity in the dogs. All measurements were made using the same Misco digital refractometer. Results: Intraindividual USG was variable over the course of the study. The mean difference between the minimum and maximum USG for each dog was 0.015 (SD, 0.007). The within‐week difference between the minimum and maximum USG was less than over the complete 2‐week study (0.009 [SD 0.006] for week 1 and 0.010 [SD 0.007] for week 2). The mean coefficient of variance across all 6 time points was 15.4% (SD 8.97%). Conclusions and Clinical Importance: Clinically important variation occurs in USG in healthy animals and might impact clinical decision‐making when diagnostic cutoff points are utilized. Clinicians should be aware of inherent variability in this clinical variable when analyzing results.