Emollients and moisturizers for eczema: abridged Cochrane systematic review including GRADE assessments. (1st October 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Emollients and moisturizers for eczema: abridged Cochrane systematic review including GRADE assessments. (1st October 2017)
- Main Title:
- Emollients and moisturizers for eczema: abridged Cochrane systematic review including GRADE assessments
- Authors:
- van Zuuren, E.J.
Fedorowicz, Z.
Arents, B.W.M. - Abstract:
- Summary: Eczema is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder with considerable impact on quality of life. Emollients or moisturizers are widely recommended, but are these effective and safe? We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Skin Register, CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, the GREAT database and five trial registers to December 2015. We included 77 RCTs with 6603 participants. Seven studies (9%) were at low risk of bias, 34 (44%) had unclear risk and 36 (47%) were at high risk. The quality of the evidence was mainly low or moderate for the prespecified outcomes. The most important comparison, 'moisturizer vs. no moisturizer', showed improved Scoring Atopic Dermatitis values in the moisturizer group compared with no moisturizer [mean difference −2·42, 95% confidence interval (CI) −4·55 to −0·28], but did not meet the minimal important difference of 8·7. Fewer flares were seen (risk ratio 0·40, 95% CI 0·23–0·70) and the rate of flares was reduced (hazard ratio 3·74, 95% CI 1·86–7·50). The groups applying moisturizer used less topical corticosteroids over 6–8 weeks (mean difference −9·30 g, 95% CI 15·3 to −3·27). Glycyrrhetinic acid‐, urea‐ and glycerol‐containing creams worked better than their controls (vehicle, placebo or no moisturizer) according to both participants and physicians. More flares were reported with moisturizer alone than when combined with twice‐weekly fluticasone propionate (riskSummary: Eczema is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder with considerable impact on quality of life. Emollients or moisturizers are widely recommended, but are these effective and safe? We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Skin Register, CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, the GREAT database and five trial registers to December 2015. We included 77 RCTs with 6603 participants. Seven studies (9%) were at low risk of bias, 34 (44%) had unclear risk and 36 (47%) were at high risk. The quality of the evidence was mainly low or moderate for the prespecified outcomes. The most important comparison, 'moisturizer vs. no moisturizer', showed improved Scoring Atopic Dermatitis values in the moisturizer group compared with no moisturizer [mean difference −2·42, 95% confidence interval (CI) −4·55 to −0·28], but did not meet the minimal important difference of 8·7. Fewer flares were seen (risk ratio 0·40, 95% CI 0·23–0·70) and the rate of flares was reduced (hazard ratio 3·74, 95% CI 1·86–7·50). The groups applying moisturizer used less topical corticosteroids over 6–8 weeks (mean difference −9·30 g, 95% CI 15·3 to −3·27). Glycyrrhetinic acid‐, urea‐ and glycerol‐containing creams worked better than their controls (vehicle, placebo or no moisturizer) according to both participants and physicians. More flares were reported with moisturizer alone than when combined with twice‐weekly fluticasone propionate (risk ratio 2·17, 95% CI 1·55–3·11). Adding moisturizers to topical anti‐inflammatory treatment was more effective than anti‐inflammatory treatment alone and resulted in fewer flares. Abstract : What's already known about this topic? Skin moisturization is a constituent part of standard management for eczema. It is unclear which moisturizers are most effective and safe and which are preferred by people with eczema. Existing gaps in the evidence on the effects of moisturizers warrant further investigation in a systematic review. What does this study add? In general, most moisturizers demonstrate some beneficial effects, reducing the number of flares, prolonging the time to flare and reducing the need for corticosteroids. When combined with topical corticosteroids, moisturizers are more effective than topical corticosteroids alone. The review did not show convincingly that one moisturizer works better than another. The quality of evidence was mainly low or moderate for the prespecified outcomes. Linked Comment: Silverberg. Br J Dermatol 2017; 177 :1154 . Plain language summary available online … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of dermatology. Volume 177:Number 5(2017)
- Journal:
- British journal of dermatology
- Issue:
- Volume 177:Number 5(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 177, Issue 5 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 177
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0177-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 1256
- Page End:
- 1271
- Publication Date:
- 2017-10-01
- Subjects:
- Dermatology -- Periodicals
Skin -- Diseases -- Periodicals
616.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2133 ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjd ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/bjd.15602 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-0963
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2307.400000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14239.xml