The Effects of Population Size Histories on Estimates of Selection Coefficients from Time-Series Genetic Data. (22nd August 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jewett, Ethan M.; Steinrücken, Matthias; Song, Yun S.
• Is Part Of: Molecular biology and evolution. Volume 33:Number 11(2016:Nov.)
• Page Start: 3002
• Page End: 3027
• Publication Date: 2016-08-22
• Subjects: selection -- inference -- time series -- diffusion -- Wright–Fisher; Molecular biology -- Periodicals; Molecular evolution -- Periodicals; Evolution, Molecular -- Periodicals; Molecular Biology -- Periodicals; 572.8
• DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msw173
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0737-4038

Abstract

Abstract: Many approaches have been developed for inferring selection coefficients from time series data while accounting for genetic drift. These approaches have been motivated by the intuition that properly accounting for the population size history can significantly improve estimates of selective strengths. However, the improvement in inference accuracy that can be attained by modeling drift has not been characterized. Here, by comparing maximum likelihood estimates of selection coefficients that account for the true population size history with estimates that ignore drift by assuming allele frequencies evolve deterministically in a population of infinite size, we address the following questions: how much can modeling the population size history improve estimates of selection coefficients? How much can mis-inferred population sizes hurt inferences of selection coefficients? We conduct our analysis under the discrete Wright–Fisher model by deriving the exact probability of an allele frequency trajectory in a population of time-varying size and we replicate our results under the diffusion model. For both models, we find that ignoring drift leads to estimates of selection coefficients that are nearly as accurate as estimates that account for the true population history, even when population sizes are small and drift is high. This result is of interest because inference methods that ignore drift are widely used in evolutionary studies and can be many orders of magnitude faster than methods that account for population sizes.