147 Assessing Assessment: An Audit of Continence Assessment and Documentation in a City Centre Teaching Hospital. (16th September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Randles, Mary; Hayes, Mary; Cotter, Susanne; Saramago, Ines; McGrath, Kieth; O'Caoimh, Rónán; O'Connor, Kieran; O'Hea, Anne; Hannon, Evelyn
• Is Part Of: Age and ageing. Volume 48(2019)Supplement 3
• Page Start: iii17
• Page End: iii65
• Publication Date: 2019-09-16
• Subjects: Aging -- Periodicals; Geriatrics -- Periodicals; 618.97
• DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afz103.88
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0002-0729

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Urinary incontinence (UI) is defined by the International Continence Society as "any involuntary leakage of urine." UI can negatively impact patients' physical and mental wellbeing and quality of life. Since older adults constitute a growing hospital population, evaluation and improvement of this patient group's quality of care is recognized as a priority in the study hospital. A continence assessment helps to determine what the problem is and what management is required. This audit aims to determine whether appropriate assessments of continence in older adults presenting to the hospital setting were completed and documented. Methods: An audit tool was adapted from the Royal College of Physicians National Continence Audit tool and the hospital's own elimination documentation pathway. On a chosen day a general medical ward and a specialist geriatric medicine ward were assessed. Medical charts, nursing notes, emergency department proforma, frailty intervention team proforma and skin integrity proforma were reviewed. Documentation of continence status, symptoms, type, investigations, continence wear, catheterisation and management were assessed. Continence care plans and evidence of communication/discussion with patients were also assessed. Results: Thirty-one sets of documentation were reviewed. Twenty-four patients were aged over 65. Of these patients 12 were male and 12 were female. Four patients had no continence status documented. Forty-two percent of those reviewed over 65 had documented incontinence and of these only 40% had the elimination section of their nursing proforma fully completed. Six of the patients with documented incontinence had their symptoms/type of incontinence documented. Two Patients had urinary catheters, the indications for these catheters were documented Conclusion: This audit found that overall the assessment and documentation of continence in older adults was sub-optimal. Based on this audit an assessment tool and education program will be introduced to the specialist geriatric medicine ward with the goal of improving assessment of continence and optimal management.