Electroconvulsive Therapy in Incapable Patients Refusing Treatment: Prevalence, Effectiveness, and Associated Factors. Issue 3 (September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Besse, Matthias; Methfessel, Isabel; Simon, Alfred; Wille, Claudia; Zilles, David
• Is Part Of: Journal of ECT. Volume 35:Issue 3(2019:Sep.)
• Publication Date: 2019-09
• Subjects: consent -- ECT -- electroconvulsive therapy -- ethics -- legal incapacity; Electroconvulsive therapy -- Periodicals; Shock therapy -- Periodicals; Electroconvulsive Therapy -- Periodicals; Electroconvulsive therapy; Shock therapy; Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.89122
• DOI: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000572
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1095-0680

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: Severe psychiatric disorders may be accompanied by life-threatening conditions, lack of insight, and treatment refusal. Involuntary treatment may be indicated in patients who lack capacity to consent and refuse treatment. In this context, there is a lack of systematic data regarding the use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in Germany. Methods: A questionnaire with 25 items comprising quantitative and qualitative data was sent to all psychiatric hospitals in Germany that perform ECT. Cases of ECT treatment in incapable patients refusing therapy were identified retrospectively in a 12-month period. Results: Fifty-three hospitals completed the questionnaire, and 15 cases of ECT in incapable and refusing patients were reported. A marked clinical response was observed in 14 patients. Capacity to consent was restored in 11 patients. In contrast to this particularly good effectiveness, psychiatrists' attitudes revealed a widespread lack of experience as well as reservations and uncertainties regarding the use of ECT against the patient's wishes. Conclusions: In line with other recent publications, our data suggest a very good benefit-to-risk ratio for ECT in incapable patients refusing the treatment, while at the same time the provision of ECT in such patients is rare in Germany. In light of the scarcity of treatment alternatives and the possible consequences of a refusal to perform ECT in life-threatening conditions, a general rejection of involuntary ECT does not seem ethically appropriate.