Comparison of Mohs Surgery and Surgical Excision in the Treatment of Localized Sebaceous Carcinoma. Issue 9 (September 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of Mohs Surgery and Surgical Excision in the Treatment of Localized Sebaceous Carcinoma. Issue 9 (September 2019)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of Mohs Surgery and Surgical Excision in the Treatment of Localized Sebaceous Carcinoma
- Authors:
- Su, Chang
Nguyen, Kevin A.
Bai, Harrison X.
Christensen, Sean R.
Cao, Ya
Tao, Yongguang
Karakousis, Giorgos
Zhang, Paul J.
Zhang, Guiying
Xiao, Rong - Abstract:
- Abstract : BACKGROUND: It remains controversial if Mohs surgery is superior to surgical excision in treating localized sebaceous carcinoma. OBJECTIVE: To compare Mohs surgery and surgical excision for treating patients with localized sebaceous carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The US National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with histologically confirmed Stage 0 to 2 sebaceous carcinoma from 2004 to 2014. Clinicopathologic and socioeconomic factors were compared between treatment groups using the chi-square test. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated by log-rank test, multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression, and propensity score–matched analysis. Relative survival analyses compared with age- and sex-matched US population were performed. RESULTS: Of 1, 265 patients, 234 received Mohs surgery and 1, 031 received surgical excision. Mohs surgery had a higher rate of negative margin ( p = .004). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, Mohs surgery was associated with longer OS than surgical excision (HR: 0.703, 95% CI: 0.496–0.995, p = .047). The survival benefit of Mohs surgery persisted on relative survival analysis and propensity score–matched analysis ( p = .0385), after matching the 2 groups on patient and disease characteristics. CONCLUSION: Patients who received Mohs surgery had significantly longer OS when compared with those who received surgical excision. Prospective clinical trials comparing these treatment paradigms are warranted. Abstract :Abstract : BACKGROUND: It remains controversial if Mohs surgery is superior to surgical excision in treating localized sebaceous carcinoma. OBJECTIVE: To compare Mohs surgery and surgical excision for treating patients with localized sebaceous carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The US National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with histologically confirmed Stage 0 to 2 sebaceous carcinoma from 2004 to 2014. Clinicopathologic and socioeconomic factors were compared between treatment groups using the chi-square test. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated by log-rank test, multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression, and propensity score–matched analysis. Relative survival analyses compared with age- and sex-matched US population were performed. RESULTS: Of 1, 265 patients, 234 received Mohs surgery and 1, 031 received surgical excision. Mohs surgery had a higher rate of negative margin ( p = .004). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, Mohs surgery was associated with longer OS than surgical excision (HR: 0.703, 95% CI: 0.496–0.995, p = .047). The survival benefit of Mohs surgery persisted on relative survival analysis and propensity score–matched analysis ( p = .0385), after matching the 2 groups on patient and disease characteristics. CONCLUSION: Patients who received Mohs surgery had significantly longer OS when compared with those who received surgical excision. Prospective clinical trials comparing these treatment paradigms are warranted. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Dermatologic surgery. Volume 45:Issue 9(2019)
- Journal:
- Dermatologic surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 45:Issue 9(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 45, Issue 9 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 45
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0045-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-09
- Subjects:
- Skin -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Skin -- Diseases -- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.477 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001780 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1076-0512
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3555.140000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14207.xml