Effectiveness of social media (Facebook), targeted mailing, and in-person solicitation for the recruitment of young adult in a diabetes self-management clinical trial. (December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Salvy, Sarah-Jeanne; Carandang, Kristine; Vigen, Cheryl LP; Concha-Chavez, Alyssa; Sequeira, Paola A; Blanchard, Jeanine; Diaz, Jesus; Raymond, Jennifer; Pyatak, Elizabeth A
• Is Part Of: Clinical trials. Volume 17:Number 6(2020)
• Page Start: 664
• Page End: 674
• Publication Date: 2020-12
• Subjects: Diabetes mellitus -- recruitment -- randomized controlled trials -- social media; 615.5072405
• DOI: 10.1177/1740774520933362
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1740-7745

Abstract

Background/Aims: Research is needed to identify promising recruitment strategies to reach and engage diverse young adults in diabetes clinical research. The aim of this study was to examine the relative strengths and weaknesses of three recruitment strategies used in a diabetes self-management clinical trial: social media advertising (Facebook), targeted mailing, and in-person solicitation of clinic patients. Methods: Strategies were compared in terms of (1) cost-effectiveness (i.e. cost of recruitment/number of enrolled participants), (2) ability to yield participants who would not otherwise be reached by alternative strategies, and (3) likelihood of participants recruited through each strategy to adhere to study procedures. We further explored the appeal (overall and among age and gender subgroups) of social media advertisement features. Results: In-person recruitment of clinic patients was overall the most cost-effective strategy. However, differences in demographic, clinical, and psychosocial characteristics of participants recruited via different strategies suggest that the combination of these approaches yielded a more diverse sample than would any one strategy alone. Once successfully enrolled, there was no difference in study completion and intervention adherence between individuals recruited by the three recruitment strategies. Conclusions: Ultimately, the utility of a recruitment strategy is defined by its ability to effectively attract people representative of the target population who are willing to enroll in and complete the study. Leveraging a variety of recruitment strategies appears to produce a more representative sample of young adults, including those who are less engaged in diabetes care.