"But I Ain't a Judge:" The Therapeutic Jurisprudence Implications of the Use of Nonjudicial Officers in Criminal Justice Cases. (November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Perlin, Michael L.
• Other Names: Frailing Kelly guest-editor.; Perlin Michael L. guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: American behavioral scientist. Volume 64:Number 12(2020)
• Page Start: 1686
• Page End: 1701
• Publication Date: 2020-11
• Subjects: criminal procedure -- therapeutic jurisprudence -- non-judicial officers -- probation -- role of judges; Social sciences -- Periodicals; Political science -- Periodicals; United States -- Social conditions -- Periodicals; United States -- Politics and government -- Periodicals; 300
• DOI: 10.1177/0002764220956696
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0002-7642

Abstract

The role of nonjudicial officers occupies a hidden space in the U.S. judicial system. Statutorily sanctioned in many jurisdictions, such officers have a wide range of duties and responsibilities, including hearing certain pretrial motions in criminal cases and making decisions as to conditions of probation for sex offenders. These latter officers are frequently not lawyers, and there is significant evidence that many of the basic rudiments of the criminal trial process are often not honored. There has been virtually no consideration of this phenomenon in the scholarly literature, and absolutely no consideration from the perspective of therapeutic jurisprudence (TJ). An investigation into TJ's basic inquiry into whether legal rules, procedures, and lawyer roles need to be reshaped suggests that TJ is not practiced in the systems under discussion here.