Comparison of Immunoassays for Measuring Serum Levels of Golimumab and Antibodies Against Golimumab in Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Observational Study. Issue 4 (August 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of Immunoassays for Measuring Serum Levels of Golimumab and Antibodies Against Golimumab in Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Observational Study. Issue 4 (August 2019)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of Immunoassays for Measuring Serum Levels of Golimumab and Antibodies Against Golimumab in Ulcerative Colitis
- Authors:
- Berger, Anne-Emmanuelle
Duru, Gerard
de Vries, Annick
Marini, Joseph C.
Aoucheta, Djamila
Cornillie, Freddy
Nancey, Stephane
Detrez, Iris
Gils, Ann
Roblin, Xavier
Paul, Stephane - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Golimumab is a monoclonal anti–tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody, which is used in ulcerative colitis with an exposure–response relationship. The goal of this study was to compare results obtained with different immunoassays (golimumab and antigolimumab antibodies trough levels). Methods: This study was based on samples from 78 ulcerative colitis patients on golimumab treatment. Golimumab was quantified by either an anti-IgG detection antibody (Theradiag, Marne la Vallée, France) or an antibody directed against golimumab (Sanquin, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, and Janssen R&D, San Diego, CA). Bridging drug-sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Theradiag, Janssen R&D, and KU Leuven), a bridging drug-tolerant enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Janssen R&D), and a radioimmunoassay (Sanquin) were used to quantify antidrug antibody. Results: Median serum golimumab levels were 4.5, 3.5, 4.9, and 2.4 mcg/mL with Theradiag, Sanquin, KU Leuven, and Janssen R&D assay, respectively ( P < 0.05). Correlation coefficients between assays ranged from 0.9 to 0.97. When using the KU Leuven and Janssen R&D assays, 86% of samples were in the same quartile of distribution of values, and for Sanquin and Janssen R&D assays, this overlap was 80%. The concordance observed for the other pairs was 83% (Sanquin/KU Leuven R&D), 71% (Theradiag/KU Leuven), and 68% (Theradiag/Janssen R&D and Theradiag/Sanquin). The specificity of assays forAbstract : Background: Golimumab is a monoclonal anti–tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody, which is used in ulcerative colitis with an exposure–response relationship. The goal of this study was to compare results obtained with different immunoassays (golimumab and antigolimumab antibodies trough levels). Methods: This study was based on samples from 78 ulcerative colitis patients on golimumab treatment. Golimumab was quantified by either an anti-IgG detection antibody (Theradiag, Marne la Vallée, France) or an antibody directed against golimumab (Sanquin, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, and Janssen R&D, San Diego, CA). Bridging drug-sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Theradiag, Janssen R&D, and KU Leuven), a bridging drug-tolerant enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Janssen R&D), and a radioimmunoassay (Sanquin) were used to quantify antidrug antibody. Results: Median serum golimumab levels were 4.5, 3.5, 4.9, and 2.4 mcg/mL with Theradiag, Sanquin, KU Leuven, and Janssen R&D assay, respectively ( P < 0.05). Correlation coefficients between assays ranged from 0.9 to 0.97. When using the KU Leuven and Janssen R&D assays, 86% of samples were in the same quartile of distribution of values, and for Sanquin and Janssen R&D assays, this overlap was 80%. The concordance observed for the other pairs was 83% (Sanquin/KU Leuven R&D), 71% (Theradiag/KU Leuven), and 68% (Theradiag/Janssen R&D and Theradiag/Sanquin). The specificity of assays for golimumab was demonstrated. Antidrug antibodies were detected in 28.2% of the samples with the Janssen R&D drug-tolerant assay and in the same 2 patients by the 3 other assays. Conclusions: Performances of these immunoassays were similar in terms of quality, but differences in the quantitative results point to the importance of using the same assay consistently to monitor a patient's treatment. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Therapeutic drug monitoring. Volume 41:Issue 4(2019:Aug.)
- Journal:
- Therapeutic drug monitoring
- Issue:
- Volume 41:Issue 4(2019:Aug.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 41, Issue 4 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 41
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0041-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-08
- Subjects:
- golimumab -- pharmacokinetic -- monitoring -- IBD
Pharmacokinetics -- Periodicals
Patient monitoring -- Periodicals
Drugs -- Analysis -- Periodicals
Body fluids -- Analysis -- Periodicals
Drug Therapy -- Periodicals
Monitoring, Physiologic -- Periodicals
Pharmacology -- Periodicals
615.7 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/drug-monitoring/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=toc&D=yrovft&AN=00007691-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.drug-monitoring.com/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗
http://www.lww.com/Product/0163-4356 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000629 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0163-4356
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8814.643000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14181.xml