Sustainability and Land tenure: Who owns the floodplain in the Pantanal, Brazil?. (May 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chiaravalloti, Rafael Morais; Homewood, Katherine; Erikson, Kirsten
• Is Part Of: Land use policy. Volume 64(2017)
• Page Start: 511
• Page End: 524
• Publication Date: 2017-05
• Subjects: Sustainability -- Land tenure -- Property -- Resource use -- The pantanal; Land use -- Periodicals; Land use -- Government policy -- Periodicals; Sol, Utilisation du -- Périodiques; Sol, Utilisation du -- Politique gouvernementale -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 333.7305
• DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.03.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0264-8377

Abstract

Highlights: Conventional property systems do not map well onto unpredictable, dynamic ecosystems. Resource access and use in wetlands and semi-arid rangelands are customarily mobile. Locally-adapted resource use, not specific property regime, dictates sustainability. Economics, anthropology and ecology help address land conflict in Brazil's Pantanal. Multidisciplinary approaches mesh management policies better with local realities. Abstract: In seeking to achieve poverty alleviation and environmental conservation, public policy has often centred on guaranteeing land titles to local peoples. However, such approaches have brought unintended outcomes, replacing small-scale economies and natural areas by intensive exploitation of resources with no clear improvement in local people's wellbeing. To understand this, we go beyond a general political ecology framing to consider relations between sustainability and land tenure, focusing on the intersection of economics, ecology and anthropology to understand how land tenure, property and use play out on the ground. We draw together different concepts including bundle of rights, de facto and de jure resource use, property regimes, density-dependence and non-equilibrium theory. The significance of this three-discipline view is illustrated through a case study of the Pantanal wetland, Brazil, where conservationists, the government and the local population contest ownership of the Paraguay River floodplain. Government sought to address conflicts around tenure and access through a narrow view of property, which failed to encompass the overlapping layers of land tenure, property and use on the ground and only served to create further legal battles. This article concludes that a more complex view combining the three perspectives is needed in the case of the Pantanal, and in other cases of contested property rights, in order to resolve conflicting claims and foster sustainability. We dissect both the power plays involved between different groups competing for control of a valuable resource, and the legal frameworks which can and should provide checks and balances in the system. The more nuanced grasp that emerges of local systems of tenure and access, of how these diverge from western property concepts, and of their environmental implications favours a better understanding of local realities, allowing for better management policy and consequently contributing more effectively towards poverty alleviation and environmental protection.