Chromosomal aberrations in pregnancy and fetal loss: Insight on the effect of consanguinity, review of 1625 cases. Issue 8 (18th June 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Chromosomal aberrations in pregnancy and fetal loss: Insight on the effect of consanguinity, review of 1625 cases. Issue 8 (18th June 2019)
- Main Title:
- Chromosomal aberrations in pregnancy and fetal loss: Insight on the effect of consanguinity, review of 1625 cases
- Authors:
- Najafi, Kimia
Gholami, Soheila
Moshtagh, Azadeh
Bazrgar, Masood
Sadatian, Neda
Abbasi, Golemaryam
Rostami, Parvin
Khalili, Soheila
Babanejad, Mojgan
Nourmohammadi, Bahareh
Faramarzi Garous, Negin
Najmabadi, Hossein
Kariminejad, Roxana - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Pregnancy loss affects 10%–15% of pregnancies and is caused by several factors, maternal and fetal. Most common cause is chromosomal aneuploidy and has traditionally been detected by karyotyping product of conception and/or fetal tissue. In recent years, array comparative genomic hybridization (a‐CGH) has been used because of its higher detection and lower failure rates. Methods: DNA was extracted from 1625 products of abortion or fetal tissue. In 1, 104 cases both quantitative fluorescent‐polymerase chain reaction (QF‐PCR) and a‐CGH, and in 521 cases only a‐CGH, was performed. Results: The detection rate using QF‐PCR and a‐CGH is 20% compared to 12.7%, overall, and 15.7%, excluding failed samples, by karyotypes in our center. QF‐PCR and a‐CGH failed in 1.9% of cases, while the failure rate for karyotypes was 20.1%. The difference of detection and failure rates is significant ( p ‐value < 0.001 and p ‐value < 0.001 respectively). Unexpectedly we also found a significant difference in frequency of imbalances in related versus unrelated couples. ( χ 2 = 11.4926, p ‐value < 0.001). Conclusion: It is highly likely that the pregnancy loss in consanguineous couples is caused by other genetic and immune mechanisms. It is plausible that, through the same mechanism by which single gene disorders have a higher prevalence of manifesting disease in consanguineous couples, they can cause lethal genetic disorders leading to pregnancy loss and intra‐uterine fetalAbstract: Background: Pregnancy loss affects 10%–15% of pregnancies and is caused by several factors, maternal and fetal. Most common cause is chromosomal aneuploidy and has traditionally been detected by karyotyping product of conception and/or fetal tissue. In recent years, array comparative genomic hybridization (a‐CGH) has been used because of its higher detection and lower failure rates. Methods: DNA was extracted from 1625 products of abortion or fetal tissue. In 1, 104 cases both quantitative fluorescent‐polymerase chain reaction (QF‐PCR) and a‐CGH, and in 521 cases only a‐CGH, was performed. Results: The detection rate using QF‐PCR and a‐CGH is 20% compared to 12.7%, overall, and 15.7%, excluding failed samples, by karyotypes in our center. QF‐PCR and a‐CGH failed in 1.9% of cases, while the failure rate for karyotypes was 20.1%. The difference of detection and failure rates is significant ( p ‐value < 0.001 and p ‐value < 0.001 respectively). Unexpectedly we also found a significant difference in frequency of imbalances in related versus unrelated couples. ( χ 2 = 11.4926, p ‐value < 0.001). Conclusion: It is highly likely that the pregnancy loss in consanguineous couples is caused by other genetic and immune mechanisms. It is plausible that, through the same mechanism by which single gene disorders have a higher prevalence of manifesting disease in consanguineous couples, they can cause lethal genetic disorders leading to pregnancy loss and intra‐uterine fetal death (IUFD) in these couples. Our findings suggest that this is a matter for further study as it will greatly influence the approach to counseling and managing consanguineous couples with pregnancy loss. Abstract : This study is a review of 1625 product of abortion and fetal tissue using Array comparative genomic hybridization in combination with QF‐PCR. This is the second largest study with the main difference 35 percent of couples are related. We found a statistically significant difference between copy number variations and aneuploidies found in related versus unrelated couples. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Molecular genetics & genomic medicine. Volume 7:Issue 8(2019)
- Journal:
- Molecular genetics & genomic medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 7:Issue 8(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 7, Issue 8 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 7
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0007-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- n/a
- Page End:
- n/a
- Publication Date:
- 2019-06-18
- Subjects:
- array comparative genomic hybridization -- chromosomal abnormality -- consanguinity -- miscarriage -- recurrent abortion
Medical genetics -- Periodicals
Genomics -- Periodicals
616.042 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2324-9269 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/mgg3.820 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2324-9269
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14134.xml