Comorbidities, concomitant medications and potential drug‐drug interactions with interferon‐free direct‐acting antiviral agents in hepatitis C patients in Taiwan. Issue 11 (25th October 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comorbidities, concomitant medications and potential drug‐drug interactions with interferon‐free direct‐acting antiviral agents in hepatitis C patients in Taiwan. Issue 11 (25th October 2018)
- Main Title:
- Comorbidities, concomitant medications and potential drug‐drug interactions with interferon‐free direct‐acting antiviral agents in hepatitis C patients in Taiwan
- Authors:
- Liu, Chen‐Hua
Yu, Ming‐Lung
Peng, Cheng‐Yuan
Hsieh, Tsai‐Yuan
Huang, Yi‐Hsiang
Su, Wei‐Wen
Cheng, Pin‐Nan
Lin, Chih‐Lin
Lo, Ching‐Chu
Chen, Chi‐Yi
Chen, Jyh‐Jou
Ma, Qian
Brooks‐Rooney, Craig
Kao, Jia‐Horng - Abstract:
- Summary: Background: While direct‐acting antivirals have been approved for treating hepatitis C, the guidelines highlight the importance of considering potential drug‐drug interactions between DAAs and concomitant medications. Aim: To assess comorbidity prevalence, concomitant medication use and potential drug‐drug interactions between DAAs and concomitant medications for hepatitis C patients in Taiwan. Methods: This cross‐sectional study enrolled 822 patients from May to August 2016 in Taiwan. Patient demographics, comorbidities and concomitant medications were evaluated by physician surveys. Results: A total of 709 (86.3%) patients had ≥1 comorbidity; the most prevalent comorbidity categories were diseases of the digestive system (40.1%), circulatory system (38.7%) and endocrine/nutritional/metabolic diseases (35.2%). Elderly patients had more comorbidities. A total of 622 (75.7%) patients received ≥1 concomitant medication; the average number of concomitant medications was 3.2. The most common concomitant medication classes were cardiovascular (34.4%), gastrointestinal (25.7%) and central nervous system drugs (22.7%). Among patients without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis, contraindications were most prevalent with paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir plus dasabuvir, daclatasvir/asunaprevir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (13.3%, 6.0% and 5.4% respectively), and least prevalent with sofosbuvir, sofosbuvir/daclatasvir, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir and sofosbuvir/velpatasvirSummary: Background: While direct‐acting antivirals have been approved for treating hepatitis C, the guidelines highlight the importance of considering potential drug‐drug interactions between DAAs and concomitant medications. Aim: To assess comorbidity prevalence, concomitant medication use and potential drug‐drug interactions between DAAs and concomitant medications for hepatitis C patients in Taiwan. Methods: This cross‐sectional study enrolled 822 patients from May to August 2016 in Taiwan. Patient demographics, comorbidities and concomitant medications were evaluated by physician surveys. Results: A total of 709 (86.3%) patients had ≥1 comorbidity; the most prevalent comorbidity categories were diseases of the digestive system (40.1%), circulatory system (38.7%) and endocrine/nutritional/metabolic diseases (35.2%). Elderly patients had more comorbidities. A total of 622 (75.7%) patients received ≥1 concomitant medication; the average number of concomitant medications was 3.2. The most common concomitant medication classes were cardiovascular (34.4%), gastrointestinal (25.7%) and central nervous system drugs (22.7%). Among patients without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis, contraindications were most prevalent with paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir plus dasabuvir, daclatasvir/asunaprevir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (13.3%, 6.0% and 5.4% respectively), and least prevalent with sofosbuvir, sofosbuvir/daclatasvir, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (0.8%, 1.3%, 1.4% and 2.1% respectively). Sofosbuvir‐based regimens had no contraindications in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Conclusion: Our population represented an elderly demographic, with a high prevalence of comorbidities and widespread use of concomitant medications. The potential drug‐drug interactions between these concomitant medications and DAA regimens differed, with the fewest potential interactions with sofosbuvir‐based regimens. Abstract : LINKED CONTENT This article is linked to Kawabe et al and Liu and Kao papers. To view these articles visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15051 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15065 . … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. Volume 48:Issue 11/12(2018)
- Journal:
- Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics
- Issue:
- Volume 48:Issue 11/12(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 48, Issue 11/12 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 48
- Issue:
- 11/12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0048-NaN-0000
- Page Start:
- 1290
- Page End:
- 1300
- Publication Date:
- 2018-10-25
- Subjects:
- Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals
Digestive organs -- Effect of drugs on -- Periodicals
Gastrointestinal system -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals
Gastrointestinal system -- Effect of drugs on -- Periodicals
615.73 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2036 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/apt.15011 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0269-2813
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0787.886000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14151.xml