Computational model for detector timing effects in Compton-camera based prompt-gamma imaging for proton radiotherapy. (12th June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Maggi, Paul; Peterson, Steve; Panthi, Rajesh; Mackin, Dennis; Yang, Hao; He, Zhong; Beddar, Sam; Polf, Jerimy
• Is Part Of: Physics in medicine & biology. Volume 65:Number 12(2020:Jun.)
• Publication Date: 2020-06-12
• Subjects: Compton camera -- prompt-gamma imaging -- proton therapy -- detector modeling and simulation -- range verification; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Medical physics -- Periodicals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab8bf0
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0031-9155

Abstract

Abstract: This paper describes a realistic simulation of a Compton-camera (CC) based prompt-gamma (PG) imaging system for proton range verification for a range of clinical dose rates, and its comparison to PG measured data with a pre-clinical CC. We used a Monte Carlo plus Detector Effects (MCDE) model to simulate the production of prompt gamma-rays (PG) and their energy depositions in the CC. With Monte Carlo, we simulated PG emission resulting from irradiation of a high density polyethylene phantom with a 150 MeV proton pencil beam at dose rates of 5.0 × 10 8, 2.6 × 10 9, and 4.6 × 10 9 p + s −1 . Realistic detector timing effects (e.g. delayed triggering time, event-coincidence, dead time, etc, ) were added in post-processing to allow for flexible count rate variations. We acquired PG emission measurements with our pre-clinical CC during irradiation with a clinical 150 MeV proton pencil beam at the same dose rates. For simulations and measurements, three primary changes could be seen in the PG emission data as the dose rate increased: (1) reduction in the total number of detected events due to increased dead-time percentage; (2) increase in false-coincidence events (i.e. multiple PGs interacting, rather than a single PG scatter); and (3) loss of distinct PG emission peaks in the energy spectrum. We used the MCDE model to estimate the quality of our measured PG data, primarily with regards to true and false double-scatters and triple-scatters recorded by the CC. The simulation results showed that of the recorded double-scatter PG interactions 22%, 57%, and 70% were false double-scatters and for triple-scatter interactions 3%, 21%, and 35% were false events at 5.0 × 10 8, 2.6 × 10 9, and 4.6 × 10 9 p + s −1, respectively. These false scatter events represent noise in the data, and the high percentage of these events in the data represents a major limitation in our ability to produce usable PG images with our prototype CC.