A Comparison of Thresholding Methods for Forensic Reconstruction Studies Using Fluorescent Powder Proxies for Trace Materials. Issue 2 (25th October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Levin, Emma A.; Morgan, Ruth M.; Griffin, Lewis D.; Jones, Vivienne J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of forensic sciences. Volume 64:Issue 2(2019)
• Page Start: 431
• Page End: 442
• Publication Date: 2018-10-25
• Subjects: forensic science -- trace evidence -- transfer and persistence -- ultraviolet -- fluorescence -- image processing -- segmentation -- thresholding; Medical jurisprudence -- Periodicals; Forensic sciences -- Periodicals; Forensic Medicine -- Periodicals; Gerechtelijke geneeskunde; Gerechtelijke chemie; Gerechtelijke psychiatrie; 363.2505
• DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13938
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-1198

Abstract

Abstract: Image segmentation is a fundamental precursor to quantitative image analysis. At present, no standardised methodology exists for segmenting images of fluorescent proxies for trace evidence. Experiments evaluated (i) whether manual segmentation is reproducible within and between examiners (with three participants repeatedly tracing three images) (ii) whether manually defining a threshold level offers accurate and reproducible results (with 20 examiners segmenting 10 images), and (iii) whether a global thresholding algorithm might perform with similar accuracy, while offering improved reproducibility and efficiency (16 algorithms tested). Statistically significant differences were seen between examiners' traced outputs. Manually thresholding produced good accuracy on average (within ±1% of the expected values), but poor reproducibility (with multiple outliers). Three algorithms (Yen, MaxEntropy, and RenyiEntropy) offered similar accuracy, with improved reproducibility and efficiency. Together, these findings suggest that appropriate algorithms could perform thresholding tasks as part of a robust workflow for reconstruction studies employing fluorescent proxies for trace evidence.