Automated virtual reality exposure therapy for spider phobia vs. in-vivo one-session treatment: A randomized non-inferiority trial. (July 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Automated virtual reality exposure therapy for spider phobia vs. in-vivo one-session treatment: A randomized non-inferiority trial. (July 2019)
- Main Title:
- Automated virtual reality exposure therapy for spider phobia vs. in-vivo one-session treatment: A randomized non-inferiority trial
- Authors:
- Miloff, Alexander
Lindner, Philip
Dafgård, Peter
Deak, Stefan
Garke, Maria
Hamilton, William
Heinsoo, Julia
Kristoffersson, Glenn
Rafi, Jonas
Sindemark, Kerstin
Sjölund, Jessica
Zenger, Maria
Reuterskiöld, Lena
Andersson, Gerhard
Carlbring, Per - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: This study compared the efficacy of a technician-assisted single-session virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) for the treatment of spider phobia featuring low-cost consumer-available hardware and novel automated software to gold-standard in-vivo one-session treatment (OST), using a parallel group randomized non-inferiority design. Method Participants (N = 100) were randomized to VRET and OST arms. Assessors blinded to treatment allocation evaluated participants at pre- and post-treatment as well follow-up (3 and 12 months) using a behavioral approach test (BAT) and self-rated fear of spider, anxiety, depression and quality-of-life scales. A maximum post-treatment difference of 2-points on the BAT qualified as non-inferiority margin. Results Linear mixed models noted large, significant reductions in behavioral avoidance and self-reported fear in both groups at post-treatment, with VRET approaching the strong treatment benefits of OST over time. Non-inferiority was identified at 3- and 12- months follow-up but was significantly worse until 12-months. There was no significant difference on a questionnaire measuring negative effects. Conclusions Automated VRET efficaciously reduced spider phobia symptoms in the short-term and was non-inferior to in-vivo exposure therapy in the long-term. VRET effectiveness trials are warranted to evaluate real-world benefits and non-specific therapeutic factors accruing from the presence of a technician during treatment.Abstract: Objective: This study compared the efficacy of a technician-assisted single-session virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) for the treatment of spider phobia featuring low-cost consumer-available hardware and novel automated software to gold-standard in-vivo one-session treatment (OST), using a parallel group randomized non-inferiority design. Method Participants (N = 100) were randomized to VRET and OST arms. Assessors blinded to treatment allocation evaluated participants at pre- and post-treatment as well follow-up (3 and 12 months) using a behavioral approach test (BAT) and self-rated fear of spider, anxiety, depression and quality-of-life scales. A maximum post-treatment difference of 2-points on the BAT qualified as non-inferiority margin. Results Linear mixed models noted large, significant reductions in behavioral avoidance and self-reported fear in both groups at post-treatment, with VRET approaching the strong treatment benefits of OST over time. Non-inferiority was identified at 3- and 12- months follow-up but was significantly worse until 12-months. There was no significant difference on a questionnaire measuring negative effects. Conclusions Automated VRET efficaciously reduced spider phobia symptoms in the short-term and was non-inferior to in-vivo exposure therapy in the long-term. VRET effectiveness trials are warranted to evaluate real-world benefits and non-specific therapeutic factors accruing from the presence of a technician during treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02533310). Highlights: Non-inferiority of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) for spider phobia tested. Patients (N = 100) were randomized to VRET or in-vivo one-session treatment (OST). Technician-assisted automated VRET significantly reduced fear of spider self-report. Non-inferiority obtained at 3- and 12-months according to behavioral approach test. Future studies warranted to evaluate real-world effectiveness in self-help format. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Behaviour research and therapy. Volume 118(2019)
- Journal:
- Behaviour research and therapy
- Issue:
- Volume 118(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 118, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 118
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0118-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 130
- Page End:
- 140
- Publication Date:
- 2019-07
- Subjects:
- Exposure therapy -- One-session treatment -- Virtual reality -- Spider phobia
Cognitive therapy -- Periodicals
Psychotherapy -- Periodicals
616.891 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00057967 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/265/description#description ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.brat.2019.04.004 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0005-7967
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1876.810000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14136.xml