A comparative study on patient safety attitude between nurses and doctors in operating rooms. Issue 4 (October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kwon, Eunok; Kim, Young Woo; Kim, Seo Won; Jeon, Sujeong; Lee, Eunsook; Kang, Hye-Young; Nam, Seungnam; Kim, Mihyeong
• Is Part Of: Journal of international medical research. Volume 48:Issue 4(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-10
• Subjects: Surgical safety -- nurse -- surgical time-out -- retained surgical items -- operating rooms; Medicine -- Periodicals; Pharmacology -- Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1177/0300060519884501
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-0605

Abstract

Objective: To investigate and compare the attitudes of operating room nurses and doctors regarding patient safety, performance of surgical time-out and recognition of count error. Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited operating room nurses, surgeons and anaesthesiologists between 1 August 2015 and 5 February 2016. A Safety Attitude Questionnaire was used to analyse the three elements in both groups of operating room staff (nurses and doctors). Results: The study analysed the questionnaires from 171 participants; 95 nurses (55.6%) and 76 doctors (44.4%). Differences exist between doctors and nurses regarding teamwork climate, working conditions, perception of management and the recognition of stress. On the performance of surgical time-out, nurses showed higher scores on way of counting, while doctors showed higher scores on the time-out procedure itself. Also, doctors believed they actively cooperated with the nurses, while nurses believed they did not receive cooperation. Scores for the recognition of count error were higher in nurses than in doctors. More experienced operating room staff showed higher scores than younger less experienced staff. Conclusions: Perceptual differences among doctors and nurses need to be minimized for the safety of the patient in the operating room.