A Mixed Methods Study of the Association of Non-Veterans Affairs Care With Veterans' and Clinicians' Experiences of Care Coordination. Issue 8 (August 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A Mixed Methods Study of the Association of Non-Veterans Affairs Care With Veterans' and Clinicians' Experiences of Care Coordination. Issue 8 (August 2020)
- Main Title:
- A Mixed Methods Study of the Association of Non-Veterans Affairs Care With Veterans' and Clinicians' Experiences of Care Coordination
- Authors:
- Benzer, Justin K.
Gurewich, Deborah
Singer, Sara J.
McIntosh, Nathalie M.
Mohr, David C.
Vimalananda, Varsha G.
Charns, Martin P. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Poor coordination between the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and non-VA care may negatively impact health care quality. Recent legislation is intended to increase Veterans' access to care, in part through increased use of non-VA care. However, a possible consequence may be diminished patient experiences of coordination. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine VA patients' and clinicians' experiences of coordination across VA and non-VA settings. Design: Observational mixed methods using patient surveys and clinician interviews. Sampled patients were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus and either cardiovascular or mental health comorbidities. Participants and Measures: Patient perspectives on coordination were elicited between April and September 2016 through a national survey supplemented with VA administrative records (N=5372). Coordination was measured with the 8-dimension Patient Perceptions of Integrated Care survey. Receipt of non-VA care was measured through patient self-report. Clinician perspectives were elicited through individual interviews (N=100) between May and October 2017. Results: Veterans who received both VA and non-VA care reported significantly worse care coordination experiences than Veterans who only receive care in VA. Clinicians report limited information exchange capabilities, which, combined with bureaucratic and opaque procedures, adversely impact clinical decision-making. Conclusions: VA is workingAbstract : Background: Poor coordination between the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and non-VA care may negatively impact health care quality. Recent legislation is intended to increase Veterans' access to care, in part through increased use of non-VA care. However, a possible consequence may be diminished patient experiences of coordination. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine VA patients' and clinicians' experiences of coordination across VA and non-VA settings. Design: Observational mixed methods using patient surveys and clinician interviews. Sampled patients were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus and either cardiovascular or mental health comorbidities. Participants and Measures: Patient perspectives on coordination were elicited between April and September 2016 through a national survey supplemented with VA administrative records (N=5372). Coordination was measured with the 8-dimension Patient Perceptions of Integrated Care survey. Receipt of non-VA care was measured through patient self-report. Clinician perspectives were elicited through individual interviews (N=100) between May and October 2017. Results: Veterans who received both VA and non-VA care reported significantly worse care coordination experiences than Veterans who only receive care in VA. Clinicians report limited information exchange capabilities, which, combined with bureaucratic and opaque procedures, adversely impact clinical decision-making. Conclusions: VA is working through a shift in how Veterans receive health care by increasing access to care from non-VA providers. Study findings suggest that VA should prioritize coordination of care in addition to access. This could include requiring monitoring of patient-experienced care coordination, surveys of referring and consulting clinicians, and pilot testing and evaluation of interventions to improve coordination. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Medical care. Volume 58:Issue 8(2020)
- Journal:
- Medical care
- Issue:
- Volume 58:Issue 8(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 58, Issue 8 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 58
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0058-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-08
- Subjects:
- coordination -- integration -- primary care -- mental health -- patient experience -- patient survey -- qualitative research -- Veterans -- Department of Veterans Affairs type 2 diabetes mellitus
Economics, Medical -- Periodicals
Insurance, Health -- Periodicals
Santé, Services de -- Administration -- Périodiques
Soins médicaux -- Périodiques
Medical economics -- Periodicals
Health insurance -- Periodicals
Medical economics -- United States -- Periodicals
Health insurance -- United States -- Periodicals
Comprehensive Health Care -- Periodicals
Personal Health Services -- Periodicals
Gezondheidszorg
Économie de la santé -- Périodiques
Santé, Services de -- Périodiques
Health insurance
Medical economics
United States
Periodicals
362.10973 - Journal URLs:
- http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/sp-3.5.0b/ovidweb.cgi?&S=KMNBFPPHIIDDBOCKNCALGCGCMHAHAA00&Browse=Toc+Children%7cNO%7cS.sh.269_1327399138_15.269_1327399138_27.269_1327399138_28%7c285%7c50 ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/00257079.html ↗
http://www.lww-medicalcare.com ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/00257079.html ↗
http://www.lww-medicalcare.com/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001338 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0025-7079
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5526.900000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13979.xml