Selection history is relative. (October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Liao, Ming-Ray; Britton, Mark K.; Anderson, Brian A.
• Is Part Of: Vision research. Volume 175(2020)
• Page Start: 23
• Page End: 31
• Publication Date: 2020-10
• Subjects: Attentional capture -- Selection history -- Feature-based attention; Vision -- Periodicals; 573.88
• DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2020.06.004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0042-6989

Abstract

Abstract: Visual attention can be tuned to specific features to aid in visual search. The way in which these search strategies are established and maintained is flexible, reflecting goal-directed attentional control, but can exert a persistent effect on selection that remains even when these strategies are no longer advantageous, reflecting an attentional bias driven by selection history. Apart from feature-specific search, recent studies have shown that attention can be tuned to target-nontarget relationships. Here we tested whether a relational search strategy continues to bias attention in a subsequent task, where the relationally better color and former target color both serve as distractors (Experiment 1) or as potential targets (Experiment 2). We demonstrate that a relational bias can persist in a subsequent task in which color serves as a task-irrelevant feature, both impairing and facilitating visual search performance. Our findings extend our understanding of the relational account of attentional control and the nature of selection history effects on attention.