A comparison of the automated blood bank system IH-500 and manual tube method for anti-blood group antibody titration: a quantitative approach. (August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yang, John Jeongseok; Seo, Suk Won; Kim, Jin Seok; Chung, Yousun; Kim, Hyungsuk; Ko, Dae-Hyun; Hwang, Sang-Hyun; Heung-Bum, Oh
• Is Part Of: Transfusion and apheresis science. Volume 59:Number 4(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-08
• Subjects: anti-blood group antibody -- titer -- logarithm -- regression -- comparison; Blood -- Transfusion -- Periodicals; Hemapheresis -- Periodicals; 615.39
• DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2020.102806
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1473-0502

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Anti-blood group antibody titers (ABTs) reported in titer values are variable depending on the testing method used. The introduction of new test methods such as automated methods requires proper method comparison. In this study, the automated blood bank system and manual tube method for ABT were compared using a log-transformed dataset to evaluate the alternative statistical approach. Methods: ABT was conducted using specimens referred for solid organ transplantation. Methods for comparison were conventional manual tube method and IH-500 automated blood bank system using column agglutination (CAT). Criteria for agreement were exact match and 1-titer match. Measured titer values were log-transformed into interval scale for Deming regression analysis. Results: From the comparison of the tube and CAT methods using titer values and the two criteria, the exact and 1-titer match were 15.9–41.5 % and 65.9–97.6 %, respectively. Deming regression was used to demonstrate the presence of both proportional and constant difference between the two methods. Conclusion: The method comparison using conventional statistical approaches had limits due to the semi-quantitative value of the test. Log-transformed interval scale values for comparison were useful for interpretation of method comparison datasets. This alternative statistical approach could contribute to a more accurate comparison between assays and standardization of ABT testing.