Current use and performance of the different fetal growth charts in the Italian population. (September 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Current use and performance of the different fetal growth charts in the Italian population. (September 2020)
- Main Title:
- Current use and performance of the different fetal growth charts in the Italian population
- Authors:
- Stampalija, Tamara
Ghi, Tullio
Rosolen, Valentina
Rizzo, Giuseppe
Ferrazzi, Enrico Maria
Prefumo, Federico
Dall'Asta, Andrea
Quadrifoglio, Mariachiara
Todros, Tullia
Frusca, Tiziana - Abstract:
- Highlights: We report wide discrepancies among the Italian referral centers regarding the fetal growth charts. International growth charts might under-diagnose small for gestational age fetuses. International growth charts might, especially, over-diagnose large for gestational age fetuses. Before implementing new charts, an exploratory analysis is needed. Abstract: Objectives: The choice of growth charts impacts on screening, diagnosis and clinical management of fetal growth abnormalities. The objectives of the study were to evaluate: 1) the clinical practice at a national level among tertiary referral centers in the use of fetal biometric growth charts; and 2) the impact on fetal growth screening of existing national and international growth charts. Study design: A questionnaire was sent to 14 Italian tertiary referral centers to explore biometric reference growth charts used in clinical practice. National and international (Intergrowth-21st and World Health Organization) fetal growth charts were tested on a large national cohort of low risk women with singleton uneventful pregnancy derived from a retrospective cross-sectional multicenter study (21 centers). The percentage of fetuses with biometric measurements below and above the 10th and 90th percentile for each biometric parameter and gestational week were calculated for each growth chart. The percentile curves of the study population were calculated by non-linear quantile regressions. Results: Twelve Italian centers (86Highlights: We report wide discrepancies among the Italian referral centers regarding the fetal growth charts. International growth charts might under-diagnose small for gestational age fetuses. International growth charts might, especially, over-diagnose large for gestational age fetuses. Before implementing new charts, an exploratory analysis is needed. Abstract: Objectives: The choice of growth charts impacts on screening, diagnosis and clinical management of fetal growth abnormalities. The objectives of the study were to evaluate: 1) the clinical practice at a national level among tertiary referral centers in the use of fetal biometric growth charts; and 2) the impact on fetal growth screening of existing national and international growth charts. Study design: A questionnaire was sent to 14 Italian tertiary referral centers to explore biometric reference growth charts used in clinical practice. National and international (Intergrowth-21st and World Health Organization) fetal growth charts were tested on a large national cohort of low risk women with singleton uneventful pregnancy derived from a retrospective cross-sectional multicenter study (21 centers). The percentage of fetuses with biometric measurements below and above the 10th and 90th percentile for each biometric parameter and gestational week were calculated for each growth chart. The percentile curves of the study population were calculated by non-linear quantile regressions. Results: Twelve Italian centers (86 %) answered to the questionnaire showing a wide discrepancy in the use of growth charts for fetal biometry. The cohort included 7347 pregnant women. By applying Intergrowth-21st growth charts the percentage of fetuses with head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length below the 10th centile was 3.9 %, 3.6 % and 2.3 %, and above the 90th centile 29.9 %, 32.5 % and 46 %, respectively. The percentages for the World Health Organization growth charts for head and abdominal circumferences and femur length were: below the 10th centile 6.3 %, 7.2 % and 5.3 %, and above 90th centile 22.8 %, 21.3 % and 31.9 %, respectively. Conclusions: The wide discrepancy in clinical use of fetal growth charts in Italian centers warrants the adoption of an uniform set of charts. Our data suggest that immediate application into clinical practice of international growth charts might result into an under-diagnosis of small for gestational age fetuses and, especially, in an over-diagnosis of large for gestational age fetuses with major consequences for clinical practice. On these grounds, there is an urgent need for a nationwide study for the prospective evaluation of international growth charts and, if needed, the construction and adoption of methodologically robust national growth charts. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. Volume 252(2020)
- Journal:
- European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
- Issue:
- Volume 252(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 252, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 252
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0252-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- 323
- Page End:
- 329
- Publication Date:
- 2020-09
- Subjects:
- AC Abdominal circumference -- BMI Body mass index -- BPD Biparietal diameter -- EFW Estimated fetal weight -- FL Femur length -- HC Head circumference -- IG-21st Intergrowth 21st -- SD Standard deviation -- WHO World Health Organization
Growth charts -- Small for gestational age -- Large for gestational age -- Intergrowth-21 -- World health organization
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
Reproductive health -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Reproduction -- Periodicals
Obstétrique -- Périodiques
Gynécologie -- Périodiques
Reproduction -- Périodiques
Verloskunde
Gynaecologie
Voortplanting (biologie)
Gynecology
Obstetrics
Reproduction
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
618.05 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03012115 ↗
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/els/00282243 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/03012115 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/03012115 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.059 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0301-2115
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.733000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13910.xml