Exploring the use of ultrasound imaging by physiotherapists: An international survey. (October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ellis, Richard; Helsby, Jake; Naus, Jade; Bassett, Sandra; Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, César; Carnero, Samuel Fernández; Hides, Julie; O'Sullivan, Cliona; Teyhen, Deydre; Stokes, Maria; Whittaker, Jackie L.
• Is Part Of: Musculoskeletal science and practice. Volume 49(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-10
• Subjects: Physical therapy -- Physiotherapy -- Ultrasound imaging -- Survey -- Musculoskeletal imaging; Manipulation (Therapeutics) -- Periodicals; Physical therapy -- Periodicals; Neuromuscular diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Musculoskeletal system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Manipulation (Therapeutics); Neuromuscular diseases -- Treatment; Physical therapy; Manipulation, Orthopedic; Musculoskeletal Diseases -- therapy; Neuromuscular Diseases -- therapy; Physical Therapy Modalities; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 615.82
• DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102213
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2468-8630

Abstract

Abstract: Background: National surveys in New Zealand, Australia and the United Kingdom suggest ultrasound imaging (USI) use by physiotherapists is increasing. However, concerns exist regarding clarity for scopes of practice, and availability and standardisation of training. Objectives: To investigate physiotherapists' understanding of scopes of practice for the use of USI; clarify the professional contexts, clinical uses and levels of training; and identify barriers preventing physiotherapists' USI use. Design: A cross-sectional, observational survey. Methods: An Internet-based survey, offered in 20 different languages, was used including items covering five domains: (1) demographic and professional characteristics; (2) knowledge of scope of practice; (3) USI use; (4) USI training content and duration; and (5) perceived barriers to physiotherapists' use of USI. Results: 1307 registered physiotherapists from 49 countries responded; 30% were unsure of the scope of practice for physiotherapists' USI use. 38% of participants were users of USI, reporting varied contexts and clinical uses, reflected in the broader categories of: (i) biofeedback; (ii) diagnosis; (iii) assessment; (iv) injection guidance; (v) research; (vi) and teaching. The training users received varied, with formal training more comprehensive. 62% were non-users, the most common barrier was lack of training (76%). Conclusion: These findings suggest physiotherapists' USI use is increasing in various contexts; however, there is uncertainty regarding scopes of practice. There are discrepancies in training offered, with a lack of training the most common barrier to physiotherapists' use of USI. International guidelines, including a USI training framework, are needed to support the consistent and sustainable use of USI in physiotherapy. Highlights: Global survey of physiotherapists of their use of ultrasound imaging (USI). 1307 eligible participants, respondents from 49 countries. 38% of respondents used USI in their practice; a wide variety of clinical uses. The training that physiotherapists using USI had received was varied. 62% of respondents did not use USI; the most common barrier a lack of training.