Utilization of health information technology among cancer genetic counselors. Issue 8 (28th May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ritchie, Jordon B.; Allen, Caitlin G.; Morrison, Heath; Nichols, Michelle; Lauzon, Steven D.; Schiffman, Joshua D.; Hughes Halbert, Chanita; Welch, Brandon M.
• Is Part Of: Molecular genetics & genomic medicine. Volume 8:Issue 8(2020)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-05-28
• Subjects: biomedical informatics -- genetic counseling -- health information technology -- software; Medical genetics -- Periodicals; Genomics -- Periodicals; 616.042
• DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1315
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2324-9269

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Health information technology (IT) is becoming increasingly utilized by cancer genetic counselors (CGCs). We sought to understand the current engagement, satisfaction, and opportunities to adopt new health IT tools among CGCs. Methods: We conducted a mixed‐mode survey among 128 board‐certified CGCs using both closed‐ and open‐ended questions. We then evaluated the utilization and satisfaction among 10 types of health IT tools, including the following: cancer screening tool, family health history (FHx) collection tools, electronic health records (EHRs), telegenetics software, pedigree drawing software, genetic risk assessment tools, gene test panel ordering tools, electronic patient education tools, patient communication tools, and family communication tools. Results: Seven of 10 health IT tools were used by a minority of CGCs. The vast majority of respondents reported using EHRs (95.2%) and genetic risk assessment tools (88.6%). Genetic test panel ordering software had the highest satisfaction rate (very satisfied and satisfied) at 80.0%, followed by genetic risk assessment tools (77.1%). EHRs had the highest dissatisfaction rate among CGCs at 18.3%. Dissatisfaction with a health IT tool was associated with desire to change: EHRs ( p < .001), cancer screening tools ( p = .010), genetic risk assessment tools ( p = .024), and family history collection tools ( p = .026). We found that nearly half of CGCs were considering adopting or changing their FHx tool (49.2%), cancer screening tool (44.9%), and pedigree drawing tool (41.8%). Conclusion: Overall, CGCs reported high levels of satisfaction among commonly used health IT tools. Tools that enable the collection of FHx, cancer screening tools, and pedigree drawing software represent the greatest opportunities for research and development. Abstract : The utilization and satisfaction of health IT tools among cancer genetic counselors varies. Health IT tools that enable the collection of family health history, cancer screening, pedigree management, and telegenetics represent the greatest opportunities for research and development.