Technical Note: Cardiac synchronized volumetric modulated arc therapy for stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation — Proof of principle. Issue 8 (3rd June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Poon, Justin; Kohli, Kirpal; Deyell, Marc W.; Schellenberg, Devin; Reinsberg, Stefan; Teke, Tony; Thomas, Steven
• Is Part Of: Medical physics. Volume 47:Issue 8(2020)
• Page Start: 3567
• Page End: 3572
• Publication Date: 2020-06-03
• Subjects: cardiac radiosurgery -- stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation -- ventricular tachycardia; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Medical physics; Geneeskunde; Natuurkunde; Toepassingen; Biophysics; Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1002/mp.14237
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-2405

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a rapid, abnormal heart rhythm that can lead to sudden cardiac death. Current treatment options include antiarrhythmic drug therapy and catheter ablation, both of which have only modest efficacy and have potential complications. Cardiac radiosurgery has the potential to be a noninvasive and efficient treatment option for VT. Cardiac motion, however, must be accounted for to ensure accurate dose delivery to the target region. Cardiac synchronized volumetric modulated arc therapy (CSVMAT) aims to minimize the dose delivered to normal tissues by synchronizing beam delivery with a cardiac signal, irradiating only during the quiescent intervals of the cardiac cycle (when heart motion is minimal) and adjusting the beam delivery speed in response to heart rate changes. Methods: A CSVMAT plan was adapted from a conventional VMAT plan and delivered on a Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator. The original VMAT plan was divided into three interleaved CSVMAT phases, each consisting of alternating beam‐on and beam‐off segments synchronized to a sample heart rate. Trajectory log files were collected for the original VMAT and CSVMAT deliveries and the dose distributions were measured with Gafchromic EBT‐XD film. Results: Analysis of the trajectory log files showed successful synchronization with the sample cardiac signal. Film analysis comparing the original VMAT and CSVMAT dose distributions returned a gamma passing rate of 99.14% (2%/2 mm tolerance). Conclusions: The film results indicated excellent agreement between the dose distributions of the original and cardiac synchronized beam deliveries. This study demonstrates a proof of principle cardiac synchronization strategy for precise radiation treatment plan delivery and adjustment to a variable heart rate. The cardiac synchronized technique may be advantageous in radioablation for VT.