Comparison on radiation effective dose and image quality of right coronary artery on prospective ECG‐gated method between 320 row CT and 2nd generation (128‐slice) dual source CT. Issue 8 (8th June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, Ren‐Feng; Hou, Chang‐Long; Zhou, Huang; Dai, Yan‐Shan; Jin, Li‐Qin; Xi, Qian; Zhang, Jian‐Hua
• Is Part Of: Journal of applied clinical medical physics. Volume 21:Issue 8(2020)
• Page Start: 256
• Page End: 262
• Publication Date: 2020-06-08
• Subjects: 2nd generation dual source CT scan -- 320 row CT scan -- heart rate -- image quality score -- radiation dose; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; Health Physics; Clinical Medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12911
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1526-9914

Abstract

Abstract: This retrospective study was to compare the image quality of right coronary artery (RCA) and effective radiation dose on prospective ECG‐gated method between 320 row computed tomography (CT) and 2nd generation (128‐slice) dual source CT. A total of 215 candidates underwent CT coronary angiography using prospective ECG‐gated method, 120 patients enrolled in 320 row CT group, and 95 patients in dual source CT group. We divided RCA image quality scores as 1/2/3/4, which means excellent/good/adequate/not assessable and heart rates were considered, as well as the radiation dose. There is no statistically significant difference of RCA image quality of Score 1/2 between 320 row CT and 2nd generation dual source CT, but lower heart rate (<70/min) improved RCA image quality. Meanwhile, the 2nd generation dual source CT scan have significant lower radiation dose. For patients with high level heart rate variation, both prospective ECG‐gated method of 320 row CT scan (Toshiba) and 2nd generation dual source CT scan (Siemens) basically provided good image quality on RCA. There is an advantage of effective radiation dose reduction in prospective ECG‐gated method using the 2nd generation dual source CT scan. After the iodine contrast agent was injected into elbow vein, the threshold triggering method was used to carry out prospective gated scanning, and the acquired fault image was reconstructed by the standard post‐processing software of each manufacturer. The radiation dose value is obtained through the dose report automatically generated after each scan.