Optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: A multi‐institutional retrospective study. (21st June 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: A multi‐institutional retrospective study. (21st June 2020)
- Main Title:
- Optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: A multi‐institutional retrospective study
- Authors:
- Tomimaru, Yoshito
Fukuchi, Nariaki
Yokoyama, Shigekazu
Mori, Takuji
Tanemura, Masahiro
Sakai, Kenji
Takeda, Yutaka
Tsujie, Masanori
Yamada, Terumasa
Miyamoto, Atsushi
Hashimoto, Yasuji
Hatano, Hisanori
Shimizu, Junzo
Sugimoto, Keishi
Kashiwazaki, Masaki
Kobayashi, Shogo
Doki, Yuichiro
Eguchi, Hidetoshi - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: There is no consensus on the optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis (AC). To obtain evidence for a consensus, we investigated surgical outcomes of LC after gallbladder drainage with respect to the time elapsed from gallbladder drainage to surgery in a multi‐institutional retrospective study. Methods: This study enrolled 347 patients who underwent LC after gallbladder drainage for AC at 15 institutions. Surgical outcome of LC was investigated in the cases based on the interval from gallbladder drainage to surgery. Results: The median interval from gallbladder drainage to surgery of the patients was 34 days, with a mean ± standard deviation of 58 ± 99 days. Patients were divided into four groups based on quartiles of the interval: Group A, cases with an interval of 1‐12 days; Group B, cases with an interval of 13‐34 days; Group C, cases with an interval of 35‐73 days; and Group D, cases with an interval of ≥74 days. Surgical outcomes, which were evaluated with respect to intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative hospital stay, rate of intraoperative accident, conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery, and postoperative complication, were worse in Group B than in the other groups. The finding was verified by propensity score‐matched analysis. Conclusions: Surgical outcome of LC after gallbladder drainage for AC was inferior in Group B compared with the other groups. ThisAbstract: Background: There is no consensus on the optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis (AC). To obtain evidence for a consensus, we investigated surgical outcomes of LC after gallbladder drainage with respect to the time elapsed from gallbladder drainage to surgery in a multi‐institutional retrospective study. Methods: This study enrolled 347 patients who underwent LC after gallbladder drainage for AC at 15 institutions. Surgical outcome of LC was investigated in the cases based on the interval from gallbladder drainage to surgery. Results: The median interval from gallbladder drainage to surgery of the patients was 34 days, with a mean ± standard deviation of 58 ± 99 days. Patients were divided into four groups based on quartiles of the interval: Group A, cases with an interval of 1‐12 days; Group B, cases with an interval of 13‐34 days; Group C, cases with an interval of 35‐73 days; and Group D, cases with an interval of ≥74 days. Surgical outcomes, which were evaluated with respect to intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative hospital stay, rate of intraoperative accident, conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery, and postoperative complication, were worse in Group B than in the other groups. The finding was verified by propensity score‐matched analysis. Conclusions: Surgical outcome of LC after gallbladder drainage for AC was inferior in Group B compared with the other groups. This finding could be useful for determining the optimal timing of LC after gallbladder drainage for AC. Abstract : Highlight In this multi‐institutional study, Tomimaru and colleagues investigated surgical outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after gallbladder drainage with respect to the interval between drainage and cholecystectomy. Outcomes were poorer for intervals of 13–34 days than for shorter or longer intervals. These findings may be useful in determining the optimal timing. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. Volume 27:Number 8(2020)
- Journal:
- Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences
- Issue:
- Volume 27:Number 8(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 27, Issue 8 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 27
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0027-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- 451
- Page End:
- 460
- Publication Date:
- 2020-06-21
- Subjects:
- acute cholecystitis -- gallbladder drainage -- laparoscopic cholecystectomy -- outcome -- timing
Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Biliary tract -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Pancreas -- Diseases -- Periodicals
617.556 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1868-6982 ↗
http://www.springerlink.com/content/121581 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/jhbp.768 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1868-6974
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4997.660000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13883.xml