Predicting implant size in total knee arthroplasty using demographic variables: linear regression and Bayesian modelling. (June 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Predicting implant size in total knee arthroplasty using demographic variables: linear regression and Bayesian modelling. (June 2020)
- Main Title:
- Predicting implant size in total knee arthroplasty using demographic variables
- Authors:
- Blevins, Jason L.
Rao, Vindhya
Chiu, Yu-fen
Lyman, Stephen
Westrich, Geoffrey H. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Aims: The purpose of this investigation was to determine the relationship between height, weight, and sex with implant size in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a multivariate linear regression model and a Bayesian model. Methods: A retrospective review of an institutional registry was performed of primary TKAs performed between January 2005 and December 2016. Patient demographics including patient age, sex, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were obtained from registry and medical record review. In total, 8, 100 primary TKAs were included. The mean age was 67.3 years (SD 9.5) with a mean BMI of 30.4 kg/m 2 (SD 6.3). The TKAs were randomly split into a training cohort (n = 4, 022) and a testing cohort (n = 4, 078). A multivariate linear regression model was created on the training cohort and then applied to the testing cohort . A Bayesian model was created based on the frequencies of implant sizes in the training cohort. The model was then applied to the testing cohort to determine the accuracy of the model at 1%, 5%, and 10% tolerance of inaccuracy. Results: Height had a relatively strong correlation with implant size (femoral component anteroposterior (AP) Pearson correlation coefficient (ρ) = 0.73, p < 0.001; tibial component mediolateral (ML) ρ = 0.77, p < 0.001). Weight had a moderately strong correlation with implant size, (femoral component AP ρ = 0.46, p < 0.001; tibial ML ρ = 0.48, p < 0.001). There was a significant linear correlation withAbstract : Aims: The purpose of this investigation was to determine the relationship between height, weight, and sex with implant size in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a multivariate linear regression model and a Bayesian model. Methods: A retrospective review of an institutional registry was performed of primary TKAs performed between January 2005 and December 2016. Patient demographics including patient age, sex, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were obtained from registry and medical record review. In total, 8, 100 primary TKAs were included. The mean age was 67.3 years (SD 9.5) with a mean BMI of 30.4 kg/m 2 (SD 6.3). The TKAs were randomly split into a training cohort (n = 4, 022) and a testing cohort (n = 4, 078). A multivariate linear regression model was created on the training cohort and then applied to the testing cohort . A Bayesian model was created based on the frequencies of implant sizes in the training cohort. The model was then applied to the testing cohort to determine the accuracy of the model at 1%, 5%, and 10% tolerance of inaccuracy. Results: Height had a relatively strong correlation with implant size (femoral component anteroposterior (AP) Pearson correlation coefficient (ρ) = 0.73, p < 0.001; tibial component mediolateral (ML) ρ = 0.77, p < 0.001). Weight had a moderately strong correlation with implant size, (femoral component AP ρ = 0.46, p < 0.001; tibial ML ρ = 0.48, p < 0.001). There was a significant linear correlation with height, weight, and sex with implant size (femoral component R 2 = 0.607, p < 0.001; tibial R 2 = 0.695, p < 0.001). The Bayesian model showed high accuracy in predicting the range of required implant sizes (94.4% for the femur and 96.6% for the tibia) accepting a 5% risk of inaccuracy. Conclusion: Implant size was correlated with basic demographic variables including height, weight, and sex. The linear regression and Bayesian models accurately predicted required implant sizes across multiple manufacturers based on height, weight, and sex alone. These types of predictive models may help improve operating room and implant supply chain efficiency. Level of Evidence: Level IV Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6 Supple A):85–90. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Bone & joint journal. Volume 102B:Number 6(2020)Supplement A
- Journal:
- Bone & joint journal
- Issue:
- Volume 102B:Number 6(2020)Supplement A
- Issue Display:
- Volume 102, Issue 6 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 102
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0102-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 85
- Page End:
- 90
- Publication Date:
- 2020-06
- Subjects:
- Total knee implant size prediction -- Bayesian model -- Implant supply chain efficiency
Bones -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Joints -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Orthopedic surgery -- Periodicals
617.47005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjj.boneandjoint.org.uk/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1302/0301-620X.102B6.BJJ-2019-1620.R1 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2049-4394
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library STI - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 13838.xml