Patient‐initiated follow‐up for low‐risk endometrial cancer: a cost‐analysis evaluation. Issue 7 (July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Luqman, Iqra; Wickham‐Joseph, Rochelle; Cooper, Nicola; Boulter, Louise; Patel, Nafisa; Kumarakulasingam, Priyanga; Moss, Esther L
• Is Part Of: International journal of gynecological cancer. Volume 30:Issue 7(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-07
• Subjects: Endometrial Neoplasms -- Postoperative Period; Generative organs, Female -- Cancer -- Periodicals; 616.99465
• DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-001074
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1048-891X

Abstract

ABSTRACT : Objective : Risk stratification has resulted in patient‐initiated follow‐up being introduced for low‐risk endometrial cancer in place of routine hospital follow‐up. The financial benefit to the patient and the healthcare economy of patient‐initiated follow‐up, as compared with hospital follow‐up, has yet to be explored. In this study, we explored the potential impact for both the healthcare economy and patients of patient‐initiated follow‐up. Methods : Women diagnosed with low‐risk endometrial cancer enrolled on a patient‐initiated follow‐up scheme between November 2014 and September 2018 were included. Data on the number of telephone calls to the nurse specialists and clinic appointments attended were collected prospectively. The number of clinic appointments that would have taken place if the patient had continued on hospital follow‐up, rather than starting on patient‐initiated follow‐up, was calculated and costs determined using standard National Health Service (NHS) reference costs. The time/distance traveled by patients from their home address to the hospital clinic was calculated and used to determine patient‐related costs. Results : A total of 187 patients with a median of 37 (range 2‐62) months follow‐up after primary surgery were enrolled on the scheme. In total, the cohort were scheduled to attend 1673 appointments with hospital follow‐up, whereas they only attended 69 clinic appointments and made 107 telephone contacts with patient‐initiated follow‐up. There was a 93.5% reduction in costs from a projected £194 068.00 for hospital follow‐up to £12 676.33 for patient‐initiated follow‐up. The mean patient‐related costs were reduced by 95.6% with patient‐initiated follow‐up. The total mileage traveled by patients for hospital follow‐up was 30 891.4 miles, which was associated with a mean traveling time per patient of 7.41 hours and clinic/waiting time of 7.5 hours compared with 1165.8 miles and 0.46 hours and 0.5 hours, respectively, for patient‐initiated follow‐up. Conclusion : The introduction of a patient self‐management follow‐up scheme for low‐risk endometrial cancer was associated with financial/time saving to both the patient and the healthcare economy as compared with hospital follow‐up.