Tunable LiCl@UiO-66 composites for water sorption-based heat transformation applications. Issue 26 (29th June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sun, Yangyang; Spieß, Alex; Jansen, Christian; Nuhnen, Alexander; Gökpinar, Serkan; Wiedey, Raphael; Ernst, Sebastian-Johannes; Janiak, Christoph
• Is Part Of: Journal of materials chemistry. Volume 8:Issue 26(2020)
• Page Start: 13364
• Page End: 13375
• Publication Date: 2020-06-29
• Subjects: Materials -- Research -- Periodicals; Chemistry, Analytic -- Periodicals; Environmental sciences -- Research -- Periodicals; 543.0284
• DOI: 10.1039/d0ta03442h
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2050-7488

Abstract

Abstract : No deliquescence, cycle stability, increased water uptake over a neat MOF and LiCl at low humidity, and high coefficient of performance. Abstract : Porous composite materials are potential candidates for water-based adsorptive heat transformation (AHT) applications. Here, a solid adsorbent LiCl@UiO-66 as a 'composite salt inside porous matrix' (CSPM) has been prepared by incorporating hygroscopic lithium chloride into a microporous metal–organic framework (MOF) UiO-66 as a host matrix through the wet impregnation method. In our wet impregnation we did not let the excess salt solution dry to prevent salt precipitation on the matrix surface. This yielded a true salt@MOF composite with no deliquescence of LiCl and strongly enhanced the water adsorption capacity of UiO-66 through the salt content. At p / p 0 = 0.1 the water vapor sorption isotherms show a hydration state of LiCl inside the MOF of LiCl·2–4H2 O which is much higher than for neat LiCl with 0.5H2 O, due to the dispersion of a small particle size inside the matrix. LiCl@UiO-66 with a 30 wt% LiCl content (LiCl@UiO-66_30) has a 3 to 8 times higher water uptake over neat UiO-66 (depending on relative pressure) and could reach a volumetric and gravimetric water uptake of over 2.15 g g −1 at p / p 0 = 0.9, which outperforms the so far known UiO-66-based composites. Cycling tests confirmed the hydrothermal stability of the LiCl@UiO-66 composites. Kinetic evaluation of the gravimetric water uptake (at 90% relative humidity) over time yielded rate coefficients up to 2.0(1) × 10 −4 s −1 which is slower than that in neat UiO-66 (6.7(6) × 10 −4 s −1 ) but faster than that for salt@silica gel composites. The coefficient of performance for the heat pumping mode (at T des / T ads / T evap set to 90/40/10 °C) of 1.64 for LiCl@UiO-66_30 exceeds those of other MOFs, salt@MOF or salt@silica gel composites. For thermal battery applications the heat storage capacity ( C HS ) for LiCl@UiO-66_30 is 900 kJ kg −1 (=0.25 kW h kg −1 ), which can reach the Department of Energy (DOE) value of 2.5 kW h/35 kg with just 10 kg of material and outperforms CaCl2 @UiO-66_38 with a C HS value of 367 kJ kg −1 .