The association between natural outdoor environments and common somatic symptoms. (July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Watson, C.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J.; Triguero-Mas, M.; Cirach, M.; Maas, J.; Gidlow, C.; Kruize, H.; Andrusaityte, S.; Grazuleviciene, R.; Zijlema, W.L.
• Is Part Of: Health & place. Volume 64(2020:Jul.)
• Publication Date: 2020-07
• Subjects: Common somatic symptoms -- Natural outdoor environments -- Stress -- Stress-related symptoms -- Green space -- Nature perception; Health -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; Health services accessibility -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; Political planning -- Periodicals; Social medicine -- Periodicals; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; Health Policy -- Periodicals; Health Services Accessibility -- Periodicals; Public Health -- Periodicals; Public Policy -- Periodicals; Sociology, Medical -- Periodicals; Épidémiologie -- Périodiques; Politique sanitaire -- Périodiques; Santé, Services de -- Accessibilité -- Périodiques; Health services accessibility; Health -- Social aspects; Political planning; Public health; Social medicine; Periodicals; 613
• DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102381
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1353-8292

Abstract

Abstract: There is growing evidence that urban natural outdoor environments (NOE) may positively impact health by reducing stress and stress-related symptoms. However, there is limited research investigating this link across a range of NOE indicators. This cross-sectional study investigated the association between neighbourhood NOE (availability, use, and satisfaction with NOE) and common somatic symptoms and the role of potential mediators. Data were analysed from 3481 adults from Barcelona (Spain), Doetinchem (Netherlands), Kaunas (Lithuania) and Stoke-on-Trent (United Kingdom). NOE data were obtained through self-reported data and environmental measurements. Common somatic symptom data were self-reported. Mixed effects regression models were used for analysis, with models adjusted for potential sociodemographic confounders. Higher satisfaction with neighbourhood NOE was associated with lower prevalence of common somatic symptoms (exp(β) 0.97; 95% CI 0.96, 0.98); an association partially mediated by mental health, social cohesion and air quality concern. A longer time spent in NOE was associated with lower prevalence of common somatic symptoms in low socioeconomic status neighbourhoods (exp(β) 0.98; 95% CI 0.96, 1.00). A higher number of neighbourhood green spaces (300m buffer) was associated with higher prevalence of common somatic symptoms (exp(β) 1.03; 95% CI 1.00, 1.05). No statistically significant associations were found for other NOE indicators. Study findings suggest that higher satisfaction with NOE may be associated with lower prevalence of common somatic symptoms, with mental health, social cohesion and concern about air quality playing partial mediating roles. Little evidence was found of an association between objective NOE measurements and common somatic symptoms, underlining the importance of perceptions of NOE for conferring health benefits. Highlights: We assessed indicators of neighbourhood nature and common somatic symptoms in 4 cities. Higher nature satisfaction was associated with fewer common somatic symptoms. Time in nature was associated with fewer symptoms for those in low SES neighbourhoods. Little evidence was found of a link between objective nature indicators and symptoms. The importance of NOE perceptions for conferring health benefits is underlined.