The Adoption of Oncoplastic Surgery Using Breast Reduction or Mastopexy Techniques in an Academic Breast Cancer Center Program Can Increase Breast Conservation Rates. (July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sekigami, Yurie; Chowdhury, Ritam; Char, Sydney; Radparvar, Jacob; Chen, Lilian; Parsons, Susan K.; Chatterjee, Abhishek
• Is Part Of: Annals of plastic surgery. Volume 85(2020)Supplement 1 1S
• Publication Date: 2020-07
• Subjects: oncoplastic -- breast cancer -- breast conservation; Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; 617.95205
• DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002332
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0148-7043

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Interest in oncoplastic surgery (OPS), a form of breast conservation surgery (BCS), has grown in the United States over the last decade. Oncoplastic surgery allows for the removal of larger tumors without compromising esthetic outcome or oncologic safety. One of the quality measures on which breast cancer centers in the United States are evaluated is rate of BCS. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the adoption of OPS increases BCS rates and decreases mastectomy rates at the institutional level. Methods: Clinicopathologic data were retrospectively collected for breast cancer patients in a single institution database. Rates of BCS vs mastectomy and partial mastectomy versus OPS were measured between 2012 and 2018 to capture 3 years before and 3 years after the hiring of an oncoplastic surgeon in 2015 with subsequent practice adoption of oncoplastic techniques. We compared the 2 periods using χ 2 and Fisher exact test for categorical variables. Rates of breast conservation and mastectomy were further stratified by tumor stage. Results: Four hundred sixty-eight patients underwent breast cancer surgery at Tufts Medical Center between 2012 and 2018. Patients who underwent surgery between 2012–2015 and 2016–2018 were similar in terms of age, histological type, tumor size, receipt of neoadjuvant therapy, receptor status, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. There was a statistically significant ( P < 0.0001) increase in BCS rate after 2015 attributable to the practice adoption of OPS. The proportion of patients who were recommended reexcision did not significantly increase with the introduction of OPS suggesting an appropriate and safe patient selection process for patients undergoing these breast conservation techniques. When stratified by T stage (tumor size), rates of mastectomy for T2 tumors (greater than 2 cm but less than 5 cm) decreased precipitously after 2015 and BCS increased proportionately. The rate of BCS for T1 tumors also increased but less drastically. Conclusions: The adoption of OPS in an academic breast cancer center can result in significantly higher rates of BCS, particularly for those with larger tumors (T2). Academic breast cancer centers should strongly consider incorporating OPS to their treatment paradigm to provide patients with the option to avoid mastectomy.