A Multimetric Health Literacy Analysis of Online Information for Gluteal Augmentation With Fat Grafting. (July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Oleck, Nicholas C.; Johnson, Anna Rose; Tran, Bao Ngoc N.; Ayyala, Haripriya S.; Lee, Edward S.; Lee, Bernard T.
• Is Part Of: Annals of plastic surgery. Volume 85(2020)Supplement 1 1S
• Publication Date: 2020-07
• Subjects: BBL -- Brazilian buttock lift -- gluteal augmentation -- readability -- health literacy; Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; 617.95205
• DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002425
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0148-7043

Abstract

Abstract : Background and Objectives: According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons the number of gluteal augmentations with fat grafting, colloquially known as the "Brazilian buttock lift" (BBL), doubled from 2014 to 2018. Recent studies have demonstrated that gluteal augmentation with fat grafting has a higher mortality rate when compared with other esthetic surgeries. We hypothesize that online patient-directed information for gluteal augmentation are overly complex, written at an elevated reading grade level, with incomplete or no information regarding associated surgical risks. Objective: To perform an objective appraisal of the most popular online patient education materials for gluteal augmentation surgery and explore potential interventions for improving material quality. Methods: An online Google search using the term "Brazilian butt lift" was performed and the top 10 websites providing relevant information were identified. Readability for each website was determined using Readability Studio. Understandability, actionability and cultural sensitivity was assessed with validated tools by 2 independent raters. Results: The top 10 websites were written at a mean reading grade level of 13.0, appropriate for a high school graduate. No website was written at the American Medical Association and the National Institutes of Health recommended 6th to 8th grade reading level. Mean understandability and actionability scores of 51% and 18.9%, respectively, suggest significant room for improvement. The average cultural sensitivity assessment tool score was 2.30, below the recommended threshold for acceptability of 2.5. Ninety percent of all websites did not meet the threshold for cultural acceptability. Conclusions: Online patient education materials for gluteal augmentation with fat grafting were written at an inappropriately elevated reading grade level and were overly complex, did not promote reader action, and were not sensitive to the needs of the target demographic. Abstract : Supplemental digital content is available in the text.