Entrustment decisions: Implications for curriculum development and assessment. (2nd June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tekian, Ara; ten Cate, Olle; Holmboe, Eric; Roberts, Trudie; Norcini, John
• Is Part Of: Medical teacher. Volume 42:Number 6(2020)
• Page Start: 698
• Page End: 704
• Publication Date: 2020-06-02
• Subjects: Written -- outcome-based -- postgraduate -- undergraduate -- medicine; Medical education -- Periodicals; 610.711
• DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1733506
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0142-159X

Abstract

Abstract: With increased interest in the use of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education, comes questions about their implications for curriculum development and assessment. This paper addresses some of those questions, discussed at a symposium of the 2017 conference of AMEE, by presenting the components of an EPA, describing their importance and application, identifying their implications for assessment, and pinpointing some of challenges they pose in undergraduate and postgraduate settings. It defines entrustment, describes the three levels of trust, and presents trainee and supervisor factors that influence it as well as perceived benefits, and risks. Two aspects of EPAs have implications for assessment: units of professional practice and decisions based on entrustment, which impact an assessment's blueprint, test methods, scores, and standards. In an undergraduate setting EPAs have great appeal, but work is needed to identify and develop a robust assessment system for core EPAs. At the postgraduate level, there is tension between the granularity of the competencies and the integrated nature of the EPAs. Even though work remains, EPAs offer an important step in the evolution of competency-based education.