"I can't do it if you're watching" monitoring and reciprocity in clientelism. Issue 2 (1st June 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chang, Han Il
• Is Part Of: Social science journal. Volume 54:Issue 2(2017)
• Page Start: 191
• Page End: 205
• Publication Date: 2017-06-01
• Subjects: Vote buying -- Clientelism -- Lab experiment -- Reciprocity; Social sciences -- Periodicals; 300.5
• DOI: 10.1016/j.soscij.2017.01.007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0362-3319

Abstract

Abstract: This study experimentally examines whether or not a private transfer can induce a voter to change an electoral choice based on reciprocity. It also explores whether or not the reciprocal effects of providing a private transfer vary according to the scope and quality of monitoring technologies. The study finds that reciprocity operates under both turnout monitoring and vote choice monitoring. It also finds that the effects of reciprocity are greater under turnout monitoring than under vote choice monitoring only when a voter's candidate preference on policy grounds is incongruent with the candidate providing a private transfer. The quality of monitoring, however, has little impact, as the effects of reciprocity do not vary according to monitoring probabilities. I conclude by discussing the implications of the findings.