First‐line R‐CVP versus R‐CHOP induction immunochemotherapy for indolent lymphoma with rituximab maintenance. A multicentre, phase III randomized study by the Polish Lymphoma Research Group PLRG4. (2nd December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Walewski, Jan; Paszkiewicz‐Kozik, Ewa; Michalski, Wojciech; Rymkiewicz, Grzegorz; Szpila, Tomasz; Butrym, Aleksandra; Giza, Agnieszka; Zaucha, Jan M.; Kalinka‐Warzocha, Ewa; Wieczorkiewicz, Agata; Zimowska‐Curyło, Dagmara; Knopińska‐Posłuszny, Wanda; Tyczyńska, Agata; Romejko‐Jarosińska, Joanna; Dąbrowska‐Iwanicka, Anna; Gruszecka, Beata; Jamrozek‐Jedlińska, Maria; Borawska, Anna; Hołda, Waldemar; Porowska, Agnieszka; Romanowicz, Agnieszka; Hellmann, Andrzej; Stella‐Hołowiecka, Beata; Deptała, Andrzej; Jurczak, Wojciech
• Is Part Of: British journal of haematology. Volume 188:Number 6(2020)
• Page Start: 898
• Page End: 906
• Publication Date: 2019-12-02
• Subjects: indolent lymphoma -- first‐line induction immunochemotherapy -- rituximab maintenance; Hematology -- Periodicals; Blood -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.15
• DOI: 10.1111/bjh.16264
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-1048

Abstract

Summary: R‐CVP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) and R‐CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone + rituximab) are immunochemotherapy regimens frequently used for remission induction of indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHLs). Rituximab maintenance (RM) significantly improves progression‐free survival (PFS) in patients with complete/partial remission (CR/PR). Here we report the final results of a randomized study comparing R‐CVP to R‐CHOP both followed by RM. Untreated patients in need of systemic therapy with symptomatic and progressive iNHLs including follicular (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue (MALT), small lymphocytic (SLL), and lymphoplasmacytic (LPL) lymphoma were eligible. Patients were randomized to receive R‐CVP or R‐CHOP for eight cycles or until complete response (CR). All patients with CR/PR (partial response) received RM 375 mg/m 2 q 2 months for 12 cycles. Primary endpoint was event‐free survival (EFS). Two‐hundred and fifty patients [FL 42%, MZL/MALT 38%, LPL/ Waldenström Macroglobulinaemia (WM) 11%, SLL 9%] were enrolled and randomized (R‐CHOP: 127, R‐CVP: 123). Median age was 56 years (21–85), 44% were male, 90% were in stage III–IV, 43% of FL patients had a Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score ≥3, and 33·4% of all patients had an IPI score ≥3. At the end of induction treatment, the CR/PR rate was 43·6/50·9% and 36·3/60·8% in the R‐CHOP and R‐CVP groups ( P = 0·218) respectively. After a median follow‐up of 67, 66, and 70 months, five‐year EFS was 61% vs. 56% (not significant), progression‐free survival (PFS) was 71% vs. 69% (not significant) and overall survival (OS) was 84% vs. 89% in the R‐CHOP vs. the R‐CVP arm respectively. Grade III/IV adverse events (65 vs. 22) occurred in 40 (33·1%) and 18 (15·3%) patients, P = 0·001; neutropenia in 16 (11·6%) and 4 (3·4%) patients, P = 0·017; infection in 14 (10·7%) and 3 (2·5%) patients, ; P = 0·011; and a second neoplasm in three versus seven patients., in the R‐CHOP and the R‐CVP groups respectively. This multicentre randomized study with >five‐year follow‐up shows similar outcome in patients with indolent lymphoma in need of systemic therapy treated with R‐CVP or R‐CHOP immunochemotherapy and rituximab maintenance in both arms. The minor toxicity of the R‐CVP regimen makes it a reasonable choice for induction treatment, leaving other active agents like doxorubicin or bendamustin for second‐line therapy.