Disparities in rural versus urban field triage: Risk and mitigating factors for undertriage. Issue 1 (July 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Disparities in rural versus urban field triage: Risk and mitigating factors for undertriage. Issue 1 (July 2020)
- Main Title:
- Disparities in rural versus urban field triage
- Authors:
- Deeb, Andrew-Paul
Phelos, Heather M.
Peitzman, Andrew B.
Billiar, Timothy R.
Sperry, Jason L.
Brown, Joshua B. - Abstract:
- Abstract : BACKGROUND: There are well-known disparities for patients injured in rural setting versus urban setting. Many cite access to care; however, the mechanisms are not defined. One potential factor is differences in field triage. Our objective was to evaluate differences in prehospital undertriage (UT) in rural setting versus urban settings. METHODS: Adult patients in the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study (PTOS) registry 2000 to 2017 were included. Rural/urban setting was defined by county according to the Pennsylvania Trauma Systems Foundation. Rural/urban classification was performed for patients and centers. Undertriage was defined as patients meeting physiologic or anatomic triage criteria from the National Field Triage Guidelines who were not initially transported to a Level I or Level II trauma center. Logistic regression determined the association between UT and rural/urban setting, adjusting for transport distance and prehospital time. Models were expanded to evaluate the effect of individual triage criteria, trauma center setting, and transport mode on UT. RESULTS: There were 453, 112 patients included (26% rural). Undertriage was higher in rural patients (8.6% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.01). Rural setting was associated with UT after adjusting for distance and prehospital time (odds ratio [OR], 3.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.82–6.78; p < 0.01). Different triage criteria were associated with UT in rural/urban settings. Rural setting was associated with UT forAbstract : BACKGROUND: There are well-known disparities for patients injured in rural setting versus urban setting. Many cite access to care; however, the mechanisms are not defined. One potential factor is differences in field triage. Our objective was to evaluate differences in prehospital undertriage (UT) in rural setting versus urban settings. METHODS: Adult patients in the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study (PTOS) registry 2000 to 2017 were included. Rural/urban setting was defined by county according to the Pennsylvania Trauma Systems Foundation. Rural/urban classification was performed for patients and centers. Undertriage was defined as patients meeting physiologic or anatomic triage criteria from the National Field Triage Guidelines who were not initially transported to a Level I or Level II trauma center. Logistic regression determined the association between UT and rural/urban setting, adjusting for transport distance and prehospital time. Models were expanded to evaluate the effect of individual triage criteria, trauma center setting, and transport mode on UT. RESULTS: There were 453, 112 patients included (26% rural). Undertriage was higher in rural patients (8.6% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.01). Rural setting was associated with UT after adjusting for distance and prehospital time (odds ratio [OR], 3.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.82–6.78; p < 0.01). Different triage criteria were associated with UT in rural/urban settings. Rural setting was associated with UT for patients transferred to an urban center (OR, 3.32; 95% CI, 1.75–6.25; p < 0.01), but not a rural center (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.08–5.53; p = 0.72). Rural setting was associated with UT for ground (OR, 5.01; 95% CI, 2.65–9.46; p < 0.01) but not air transport (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.54–2.55; p = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Undertriage is more common in rural settings. Specific triage criteria are associated with UT in rural settings. Lack of a rural trauma center requiring transfer to an urban center is a risk factor for UT of rural patients. Air medical transport mitigated the risk of UT in rural patients. Provider and system interventions may help reduce UT in rural settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Care Management, Level IV. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of trauma and acute care surgery. Volume 89:Issue 1(2020)
- Journal:
- Journal of trauma and acute care surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 89:Issue 1(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 89, Issue 1 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 89
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0089-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-07
- Subjects:
- Triage -- rural -- prehospital -- disparities -- air-medical
Surgical intensive care -- Periodicals
Surgical emergencies -- Periodicals
Wounds and injuries -- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.026 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/jtrauma/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/sp-3.5.0b/ovidweb.cgi?&S=NEIKFPIGHGDDBOHLNCALMDIBGLDKAA00&Browse=Toc+Children%7cNO%7cS.sh.2697_1327404888_15.2697_1327404888_27.2697_1327404888_28%7c273%7c50 ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/TA.0000000000002690 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2163-0755
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5070.510500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13761.xml