Radiation exposure awareness from patients undergoing nuclear medicine diagnostic 99mTc-MDP bone scans and 2-deoxy-2-(18F) fluoro-D-glucose PET/computed tomography scans. Issue 6 (June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ribeiro, Ana S.F.; Husson, Olga; Drey, Nicholas; Murray, Iain; May, Katherine; Thurston, Jim; Oyen, Wim J.G.
• Is Part Of: Nuclear medicine communications. Volume 41:Issue 6(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-06
• Subjects: awareness -- ionising radiation -- nuclear medicine -- patient engagement; Nuclear medicine -- Periodicals; 616.07575
• DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001177
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0143-3636

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Medical imaging is on average the largest source of artificial radiation exposure worldwide. This study seeks to understand patient's awareness of radiation exposure derived from nuclear medicine diagnostic scans and assess if current information provided by leaflets is adequate. Methods: Single-centre cross-sectional questionnaire study applied to bone scan and FDG PET/computed tomography patients, at a nuclear medicine and PET/computed tomography department over a 15-week period in 2018. Questionnaires on dose comparators were designed in collaboration with patients, public, and experts in radiation exposure. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis and quantitative data using SPSS (V. 24). Results: A total of 102 questionnaires were completed (bone scan = 50; FDG PET/computed tomography = 52). Across both groups, 33/102 (32.4%) patients reported having a reasonable understanding of nuclear medicine and 21/102 (20.6%) reported a reasonable knowledge of ionising radiations. When asked to compare the exposure dose of respective scans with common comparators 8/50 (16%) of bone scan patients and 11/52 (21.2%) FDG PET/computed tomography answered correctly. On leaflet information, 15/85 (17.6%) patients reported the leaflets do not provide enough information on radiation exposure and of these 10/15 (66.7%) commented the leaflets should incorporate more information on radiation exposure dose. Conclusion: More observational and qualitative studies in collaboration with patients are warranted to evaluate patients' understanding and preferences in communication of radiation exposure from nuclear medicine imaging. This will ensure communication tools and guidelines developed to comply with ionising radiation (medical exposure) regulation 2017 are according to patients needs and preferences. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.