Small bowel perforation caused by pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stent migration after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A case report. Issue 30 (24th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bao, Li; Chen, Zhi-Tao; Huang, Jia-Cheng; Li, Meng-Xia; Zhang, Le-Le; Wan, Da-Long; Lin, Sheng-Zhang
• Other Names: Saranathan. Maya section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 99:Issue 30(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-07-24
• Subjects: bowel perforation -- case report -- pancreatic fistula -- pancreaticoduodenectomy -- pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stent -- stent migration; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021120
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has been widely applied as a standard surgical procedure to treat periampullary diseases. The placement of a pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stent is considered an effective and safe method for preventing pancreatic fistula after PD. Recently, the role of pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stents has been challenged, as gradually increasing complications have been observed. Stent-related small bowel perforation has only occurred in 2 cases as long-term complications but has not been reported to occur within 1 week after surgery. Patient concerns: Here, we report the case of a 71-year-old female patient complaining of painless jaundice who underwent PD with a pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stent for a duodenal papillary adenocarcinoma (T4N1M0). Four days after surgery, she had a sudden rise in temperature, high white blood cell count, significantly elevated C-reactive protein and 400 ml green-brown drainage fluid. Enhanced computed tomography showed hydrops abdominis. Diagnosis: Small bowel perforation caused by stent migration was considered first. Interventions: An emergency exploratory laparotomy was performed. We located the pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stent, which extended 2 cm from the small bowel, and sutured the jejunum hole after cutting away the protruding part of the stent. Outcomes: The patient recovered smoothly and was discharged on the 7th day after the second surgery. After more than 12 months of follow-up, the patient is doing well and is free of any symptoms related to the procedure. Conclusion: We caution that stent-related complications can occur when perioperative patients suffer from unexplained or sudden changes in vital signs after PD. In addition, the function of the pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stent needs to be reevaluated by future studies.