Loss to follow-up and opportunities for reengagement in HIV care in rural Mozambique: A prospective cohort study. Issue 20 (15th May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fuente-Soro, Laura; López-Varela, Elisa; Augusto, Orvalho; Bernardo, Edson Luis; Sacoor, Charfudin; Nhacolo, Ariel; Ruiz-Castillo, Paula; Alfredo, Charity; Karajeanes, Esmeralda; Vaz, Paula; Naniche, Denise
• Other Names: Vallejo. Alejandro section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 99:Issue 20(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-05-15
• Subjects: Africa -- human immunodeficiency virus -- lost to follow-up -- Mozambique -- reengagement in care -- retention in care; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020236
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract : Abstract: Patients lost to follow-up (LTFU) over the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) cascade have poor clinical outcomes and contribute to onward HIV transmission. We assessed true care outcomes and factors associated with successful reengagement in patients LTFU in southern Mozambique. Newly diagnosed HIV-positive adults were consecutively recruited in the Manhiça District. Patients LTFU within 12 months after HIV diagnosis were visited at home from June 2015 to July 2016 and interviewed for ascertainment of outcomes and reasons for LTFU. Factors associated with reengagement in care within 90 days after the home visit were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards model. Among 1122 newly HIV-diagnosed adults, 691 (61.6%) were identified as LTFU. Of those, 557 (80.6%) were approached at their homes and 321 (57.6%) found at home. Over 50% had died or migrated, 10% had been misclassified as LTFU, and 252 (78.5%) were interviewed. Following the visit, 79 (31.3%) reengaged in care. Having registered in care and a shorter time between LTFU and visit were associated with reengagement in multivariate analyses: adjusted hazards ratio of 3.54 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.81–6.92; P < .001] and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.87–1.00; P = .045), respectively. The most frequently reported barriers were the lack of trust in the HIV-diagnosis, the perception of being in good health, and fear of being badly treated by health personnel and differed by type of LTFU. Estimates of LTFU in rural areas of sub-Saharan Africa are likely to be overestimated in the absence of active tracing strategies. Home visits are resource-intensive but useful strategies for reengagement for at least one-third of LTFU patients when applied in the context of differentiated care for those LTFU individuals who had already enrolled in HIV care at some point. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text