Access to Lung Transplantation in the United States: The Potential Impact of Access to a High-volume Center. Issue 7 (July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chan, Ernest G.; Hayanga, J.W. Awori; Tuft, Marie; Morrell, Matthew R.; Sanchez, Pablo G.
• Is Part Of: Transplantation. Volume 104:Issue 7(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-07
• Subjects: Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc -- Periodicals; Transplantation immunology -- Periodicals; 617.95
• DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003259
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0041-1337

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Health disparities plague our healthcare system. Utilizing a novel approach, we sought to assess the effects of geographic disparities on access to lung transplantation (LT) in the United States. Methods: A total of 13 743 LT adult recipients in the United Network for Organ Sharing Database were identified between May 2005 and December 2014 with a zip code status. Geographic access was defined by global spherical distance from patient zip code centroid to transplant center. Measures analyzed included the association among socioeconomic status (SES), distance to a transplant center, and center switching behavior. Results: Median distance traveled was 62.9 miles. There was an inverse relationship between Diez Roux SES and median distance traveled (90 versus 80.1 versus 60.5 versus 30, P < 0.001). There was no association found between 5-y survival and distance traveled ( P = 0.099). However, traveling >158.7 miles was associated with worse survival (hazard ration 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.2; P = 0.005). Over 80% of patients exhibiting center switching were transplanted at a high-volume center than their home institution. Those more likely to switch to a high-volume center were those with an associates/bachelor ( P < 0.005) or graduate-level degree ( P < 0.05). Recipients with high-volume home institutions had the lowest probability of switching to an alternative center (odds ratio, 0.009; P < 0.001). There was no difference in survival when comparing those transplanted at their home institution versus those who sought transplantation at an alternative institution (55.3% versus 55.0%, P = 0.41). Conclusions: Although there was no association among SES, distance traveled, and survival, access to LT services varies among populations in the United States. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.