A meta-analysis of the safety and effectiveness of pemetrexed compared with gefitinib for pre-treated advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Issue 29 (17th July 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A meta-analysis of the safety and effectiveness of pemetrexed compared with gefitinib for pre-treated advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Issue 29 (17th July 2020)
- Main Title:
- A meta-analysis of the safety and effectiveness of pemetrexed compared with gefitinib for pre-treated advanced or metastatic NSCLC
- Authors:
- Lu, Xiaoxin
Li, Shengshu
Chen, Weizong
Zheng, Dongyang
Li, Yuzhu
Li, Fang - Other Names:
- Wang. Lu section editor.
- Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: The purpose of the current meta-analysis was to compare the oncological outcomes of pemetrexed versus gefitinib in pre-treated advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods: Search the online electronic databases on comparison the effectiveness and adverse effects of pemetrexed versus gefitinib in therapy outcomes of pre-treated NSCLC to September 2019. All studies analyzed the summary odds ratios (ORs) of the main outcomes, including survival efficacy and toxicity complications. Results: In all, 5 trials involving 676 subjects were included, with 332 receiving pemetrexed and 344 using gefitinib. The pooled analysis of overall survival (OS) (OR = 0.97, 95%CI = 0.77–1.21, P = .76) and progression-free survival (PFS) (OR = 1.17, 95%CI = 0.60–2.30, P = .65) showed that pemetrexed did not achieve benefit when compared with gefitinib. In the results of subgroup analysis among the EGFR mutation-positive patients, the comparison of gefitinib therapy versus pemetrexed did show PFS benefit 0.35 (95%CI 0.12–1.01; P = .05). In terms of grade 3 or 4 side effects, a similar toxicity profile of both pemetrexed and gefitinib was shown in the incidence rate of rash ( P = .045), fatigue ( P = .97), thrombocytopenia ( P = .68) and anemia ( P = .21) between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Pemetrexed was not associated with survival benefit than gefitinib therapy among pre-treated NSCLC patients. While, gefitinib showed superior PFS efficacyAbstract: Background: The purpose of the current meta-analysis was to compare the oncological outcomes of pemetrexed versus gefitinib in pre-treated advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods: Search the online electronic databases on comparison the effectiveness and adverse effects of pemetrexed versus gefitinib in therapy outcomes of pre-treated NSCLC to September 2019. All studies analyzed the summary odds ratios (ORs) of the main outcomes, including survival efficacy and toxicity complications. Results: In all, 5 trials involving 676 subjects were included, with 332 receiving pemetrexed and 344 using gefitinib. The pooled analysis of overall survival (OS) (OR = 0.97, 95%CI = 0.77–1.21, P = .76) and progression-free survival (PFS) (OR = 1.17, 95%CI = 0.60–2.30, P = .65) showed that pemetrexed did not achieve benefit when compared with gefitinib. In the results of subgroup analysis among the EGFR mutation-positive patients, the comparison of gefitinib therapy versus pemetrexed did show PFS benefit 0.35 (95%CI 0.12–1.01; P = .05). In terms of grade 3 or 4 side effects, a similar toxicity profile of both pemetrexed and gefitinib was shown in the incidence rate of rash ( P = .045), fatigue ( P = .97), thrombocytopenia ( P = .68) and anemia ( P = .21) between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Pemetrexed was not associated with survival benefit than gefitinib therapy among pre-treated NSCLC patients. While, gefitinib showed superior PFS efficacy than pemetrexed for patients with EGFR mutation-type. Future investigations are required to identify relevant biomarkers in selected patients that would most likely benefit from pemetrexed or gefitinib treatment in pre-treated advanced NSCLC patients. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Medicine. Volume 99:Issue 29(2020)
- Journal:
- Medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 99:Issue 29(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 99, Issue 29 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 99
- Issue:
- 29
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0099-0029-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-07-17
- Subjects:
- gefitinib -- meta-analysis -- pemetrexed -- pretreated non-small cell lung cancer patients
Medicine -- Periodicals
Medicine -- Periodicals
Médecine -- Périodiques
Geneeskunde
Medicine
Periodicals
Periodicals
610.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/md-journal/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&MODE=ovid&NEWS=N&AN=00002060-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/MD.0000000000021170 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0025-7974
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5534.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13753.xml