How many screws are necessary for subtalar fusion? A retrospective study. Issue 6 (August 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- How many screws are necessary for subtalar fusion? A retrospective study. Issue 6 (August 2020)
- Main Title:
- How many screws are necessary for subtalar fusion? A retrospective study
- Authors:
- Wirth, Stephan H.
Viehöfer, Arnd
Fritz, Yannick
Zimmermann, Stefan M.
Rigling, Dominic
Urbanschitz, Lukas - Abstract:
- Highlights: For subtalar arthrodesis, 3-screw-fixation has lower revision arthrodesis and non-union rate compared to 2-screw-fixation. Prior ankle fusion, BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 and diabetes mellitus are relevant risk factors for revision arthrodesis. This study confirms the clinical relevance of previous in vitro findings for subtalar arthrodesis. Abstract: Background: Biomechanical studies have shown a higher compressive force and higher torsional stiffness for fixation with three screws compared to two screws. However, clinical data to compare these fixation techniques is still lacking. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 113 patients was performed, who underwent isolated subtalar fusion between January 2006 and April 2018. Results: Revision arthrodesis was required in 8% (n = 6/36) for 3-screw-fixation and 38% (n = 35/77) for 2-screw-fixation. For 3-screw-fixation, non-union, was observed in 14% (n = 5/36) compared to 35% (n = 27/77) in 2-screw fixation. Non-union (p = .025) and revision arthrodesis (p = .034) were significantly more frequent in patients with 2 screws. A body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 (p = .04, OR = 2.6, 95%CI:1.1–6.3), prior ankle-fusion (p = .017, OR = 4.4, 95%CI:1.3–14.5) and diabetes mellitus (p = .04, OR = 4.9, 95%CI:1.1–17.8) were associated with a higher rate of revision arthrodesis. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that successful subtalar fusion is more reliably achieved with use of three screws. However, future prospective studies will be necessary toHighlights: For subtalar arthrodesis, 3-screw-fixation has lower revision arthrodesis and non-union rate compared to 2-screw-fixation. Prior ankle fusion, BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 and diabetes mellitus are relevant risk factors for revision arthrodesis. This study confirms the clinical relevance of previous in vitro findings for subtalar arthrodesis. Abstract: Background: Biomechanical studies have shown a higher compressive force and higher torsional stiffness for fixation with three screws compared to two screws. However, clinical data to compare these fixation techniques is still lacking. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 113 patients was performed, who underwent isolated subtalar fusion between January 2006 and April 2018. Results: Revision arthrodesis was required in 8% (n = 6/36) for 3-screw-fixation and 38% (n = 35/77) for 2-screw-fixation. For 3-screw-fixation, non-union, was observed in 14% (n = 5/36) compared to 35% (n = 27/77) in 2-screw fixation. Non-union (p = .025) and revision arthrodesis (p = .034) were significantly more frequent in patients with 2 screws. A body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 (p = .04, OR = 2.6, 95%CI:1.1–6.3), prior ankle-fusion (p = .017, OR = 4.4, 95%CI:1.3–14.5) and diabetes mellitus (p = .04, OR = 4.9, 95%CI:1.1–17.8) were associated with a higher rate of revision arthrodesis. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that successful subtalar fusion is more reliably achieved with use of three screws. However, future prospective studies will be necessary to further specify this recommendation. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Foot and ankle surgery. Volume 26:Issue 6(2020)
- Journal:
- Foot and ankle surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 26:Issue 6(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 26, Issue 6 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 26
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0026-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 699
- Page End:
- 702
- Publication Date:
- 2020-08
- Subjects:
- Subtalar -- Arthrodesis -- Screws -- Fusion -- Revision
Foot -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Ankle -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Ankle -- surgery -- Periodicals
Foot -- surgery -- Periodicals
Ankle -- Surgery
Foot -- Surgery
Periodicals
Electronic journals
617.58 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/12687731 ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119485132/home ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=1268-7731;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1460-9584 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/12687731 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/12687731 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.fas.2019.08.017 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1268-7731
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3984.875000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13749.xml