Congenital unilateral proximal radioulnar synostosis: A surgical case report. Issue 16 (April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jia, Yuqing; Geng, Chunyuan; Song, Zikai; Lv, Shijie; Dai, Bin
• Other Names: NA. section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 99:Issue 16(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-04
• Subjects: bony malformation -- congenital proximal radioulnar synostosis -- diagnosis -- pediatric orthopedics -- surgical treatment; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019782
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract: Rationale: Congenital proximal radioulnar synostosis is a rare genetic malformation of the upper limb. This deformity, which is found mainly in preschool-aged children, has no recognized diagnosis and treatment. Current diagnostic methods cannot effectively assess both bone structure and soft tissue abnormalities, and most surgical treatments introduce complications and do not prevent recurrence. More work is needed; therefore, to address the diagnosis and treatment of this disease. Patient concerns: An 8-year-old male patient was hospitalized in our department. He reported deformity and limited motion in his right elbow for the past 2 years. He denied a traumatic or family history of bony malformation. The chief complaint at the time of the hospitalization was the limitation in forearm rotation. Diagnosis: Digital radiography of the right elbow joint showed proximal radioulnar synostosis and a valgus deformity. A 3-dimensional computed tomography scan further showed proximal ulna and radius dysplasia as well as anterior dislocation of the radius head. The patient was diagnosed with congenital right proximal radioulnar synostosis. Interventions: Surgical procedures included arthrolysis of the right proximal radioulnar joint, osteotomy of the proximal radius, internal fixation with Kirschner wires, and reconstruction of the annular ligament. The right elbow was immobilized in plaster in a flexion and supination position for 2 weeks. Outcomes: Recurrence of the right proximal radioulnar synostosis was observed during the 6-month follow-up, but the rotation function of the patient's forearm was significantly improved. Lessons: The findings from this case suggest that we should carefully monitor all patients younger than 6 years old who report long-term issues with forearm rotation. This case also highlights the need to assess soft tissue and epiphysis abnormalities in addition to bone assessments via digital radiography and 3-dimensional computed tomography. We suggest that surgery should not be performed until the proximal radius epiphysis has closed. Not all cases require surgical treatment, but when surgery is needed, a suitable method should be selected according to the individual needs of the patient. Any surgery performed should treat both the bony malformations and soft tissue abnormalities to maximize the therapeutic effect and reduce complications during and after surgery.