Efficacy of measuring the invasive diameter of lung adenocarcinoma using mediastinal window settings: A retrospective study. Issue 26 (26th June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Uchida, Tsuyoshi; Matsubara, Hirochika; Onuki, Yuichiro; Matsuoka, Hiroyasu; Ichihara, Tomofumi; Nakajima, Hiroyuki
• Other Names: Ding. Jianxun section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 99:Issue 26(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-06-26
• Subjects: clinical staging -- consolidation to maximum tumor diameter ratio -- ground glass nodule -- segmentectomy; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020594
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract : Abstract: The recently published 8th edition of the tumor node and metastasis Classification of Lung Cancer proposes using the maximum dimension of the solid component of a ground glass nodule (GGN) for the T categorization. However, few studies have investigated the collection of this information when using mediastinal window settings. In this study, we evaluated tumor measurement data obtained from computed tomography (CT) scans when using mediastinal window settings. This study included 202 selected patients with persistent, partly solid GGNs detected on thin-slice CT after surgical treatment between 2004 and 2013. We compared the differences in tumor diameters measured by 2 different radiologists using a repeated-measures analysis of variance. We divided the patients into 2 groups based on the clinical T stage (T1a+T1b vs T1c) and estimated the probability of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) using Kaplan–Meier curves. The study included 94 male and 108 female patients. The inter-reviewer differences between tumor diameters were significantly smaller when the consolidation to maximum tumor diameter ratio was ⩽0.5. The 2 clinical groups classified by clinical T stage differed significantly with respect to DFS when using the mediastinal window settings. However, no significant differences in OS or DFS were observed when using the lung window setting. Our study yielded 2 major findings. First, the diameters of GGNs could be measured more accurately using the mediastinal window setting. Second, measurements obtained using the mediastinal window setting more clearly depicted the effect of clinical T stage on DFS.