Outcomes With Deferred Versus Performed Revascularization of Coronary Lesions With Gray-Zone Fractional Flow Reserve Values. (December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Megaly, Michael; Khalil, Charl; Saad, Marwan; Xenogiannis, Iosif; Omer, Mohamed; Anantha Narayanan, Mahesh; Pershad, Ashish; Garcia, Santiago; Seto, Arnold H.; Burke, M. Nicholas; Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
• Is Part Of: Circulation. Volume 12:Number 12(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-12
• Subjects: fractional flow reserve -- percutaneous coronary intervention -- physiological assessment of coronary lesions; Cardiovascular system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; 616.105
• DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008315
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1941-7640

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Management of coronary lesions with fractional flow reserve values in the gray zone (0.75–0.80) remains controversial due to conflicting data on the performance versus deferral of revascularization. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of 7 observational studies including 2683 patients that compared the outcomes of deferred versus performed revascularization of coronary lesions with gray-zone fractional flow reserve values. Results: During a mean follow-up of 31±9 months, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (12.54 % versus 11.25%; odds ratio [OR], 1.64 [95% CI, 0.78–3.44]; P =0.19, I2=84%), cardiac mortality (1.25% versus 0.72%; OR, 1.78 [95% CI, 0.58–5.46]; P =0.31, I2=18%), and myocardial infarction (1.28% versus 2.66%; OR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.22–2.79]; P =0.71, I2=65%) was similar with deferral versus performance of revascularization in coronary lesions with gray-zone fractional flow reserve. Deferral of revascularization was associated with a higher incidence of target vessel revascularization (9.12% versus 5.78%; OR, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.03–3.33]; P =0.04, I2=62%). When the analysis was limited only to studies that used percutaneous coronary intervention for revascularization, deferred revascularization remained associated with a higher risk of target vessel revascularization (18% versus 7.3%; OR, 3.04 [95% CI, 1.53–6.02]; P <0.001) and was associated with a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular event (23.2% versus 13.4%; OR, 3.38 [95% CI, 1.92–5.95]; P <0.001). Conclusions: In lesions with gray-zone fractional flow reserve, revascularization was associated with a similar incidence of major adverse cardiovascular event but a lower incidence of target vessel revascularization over a mean follow-up of approximately 2.5 years. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ . Unique identifier: CRD42019128076. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.